Trial reportInvestigational new drugs2008
A phase II study evaluating bevacizumab in combination with fixed-dose rate gemcitabine and low-dose cisplatin for metastatic pancreatic cancer: is an anti-VEGF strategy still applicable?
Trial report in Investigational new drugs, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00126633 (A Study of Fixed-Dose Rate Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, and Bevacizumab in Previously Untreated Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Study of Fixed-Dose Rate Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, and Bevacizumab in Previously Untreated Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatment-related Hypertension as a Pharmacodynamic Biomarker for the Efficacy of Bevacizumab in Advanced Pancreas Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of 4 Prospective Trials of Gemcitabine-based Therapy With Bevacizumab.American journal of clinical oncology · 2016Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptors in the Vascularization of Pancreatic Tumors: Implications for Prognosis and Therapy.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Therapeutic Application of Monoclonal Antibodies in Pancreatic Cancer: Advances, Challenges and Future Opportunities.Cancers · 2021Review
- Review
- Clinical Trials Targeting the Stroma in Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2019Review
- Extraordinary response of metastatic pancreatic cancer to apatinib after failed chemotherapy: A case report and literature review.World journal of gastroenterology · 2017Review
- Article
- MiR-130 exerts tumor suppressive function on the tumorigenesis of human non-small cell lung cancer by targeting PTEN.American journal of translational research · 2017Article
- Overview of pre-clinical and clinical studies targeting angiogenesis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Cancer letters · 2016Review
- Article
- Nintedanib, a triple angiokinase inhibitor, enhances cytotoxic therapy response in pancreatic cancer.Cancer letters · 2015Article
- Enhancement of nab-paclitaxel antitumor activity through addition of multitargeting antiangiogenic agents in experimental pancreatic cancer.Molecular cancer therapeutics · 2014Article
- Article
- Can serial monitoring of serum Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), Nitric Oxide (NO), and Angiotensin II (ANGII) levels have predictive role during Bevacizumab treatment?Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2014Article
- Considerations for the prediction of survival time in pancreatic cancer based on registry data.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2013Article
- Enhancing sorafenib-mediated sensitization to gemcitabine in experimental pancreatic cancer through EMAP II.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2013Article
- Arsenic trioxide inhibits viability of pancreatic cancer stem cells in culture and in a xenograft model via binding to SHH-Gli.OncoTargets and therapy · 2013Article
- Systemic therapies for pancreatic cancer--the role of pharmacogenetics.Current drug targets · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe role of bevacizumab, a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody directed against vascular endothelial growth factor, in the treatment of pancreatic cancer remains unclear. The objectives of this study were to determine safety and efficacy in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer receiving bevacizumab in combination with fixed-dose rate (FDR) gemcitabine and low-dose cisplatin.
methodsEligible patients received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 at FDR infusion (10 mg/m(2) per minute), cisplatin 20 mg/m(2), and bevacizumab 10 mg/kg, on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Patients were monitored by computed tomography scans every two cycles and monthly serum CA19-9 measurements.
resultsOf 52 patients eligible for analysis, ten (19.2%) had an unconfirmed response and 30 (57.7%) had stable disease. Of 35 patients with elevated baseline CA19-9 levels, 20 (57.1%) had > or = 50% biomarker decline during treatment. Median time to tumor progression was 6.6 months and median survival was 8.2 months (estimated 1-year survival, 36%). Grade 3/4 toxicities possibly related to bevacizumab included thromboembolic events (15.1%), hypertension (13.2%), gastrointestinal bleeding (9.4%), cardiac events (7.5%), and bowel perforation (5.7%). Plasma vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor levels and circulating tumor cell concentration did not correlate with overall survival, either at baseline or after 2 months of therapy.
conclusionsThis bevacizumab-containing study regimen is modestly effective in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer, although occasional serious complications may occur. Given the negative results of CALGB 80303, future efforts should be focused on identifying those specific patients who are most likely to benefit from bevacizumab-based therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.