Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18379729›Full record

Trial reportInvestigational new drugs2008

A phase II study evaluating bevacizumab in combination with fixed-dose rate gemcitabine and low-dose cisplatin for metastatic pancreatic cancer: is an anti-VEGF strategy still applicable?

Andrew H Ko, Elizabeth Dito, Brian Schillinger, Alan P Venook, Zhidong Xu, Emily K Bergsland, Derrick Wong, Janet Scott, Jimmy Hwang, Margaret A Tempero

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Investigational new drugs, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00126633 (A Study of Fixed-Dose Rate Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, and Bevacizumab in Previously Untreated Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00126633 phase2completednot on this map

A Study of Fixed-Dose Rate Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, and Bevacizumab in Previously Untreated Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2004 to 2008Enrolled53ConditionsPancreatic CancerArmsbevacizumab, cisplatin, gemcitabine hydrochloride
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew H KoUniversity of California at San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1600 Divisadero Street, 4th floor, Box 1705, San Francisco, CA, 94115, USA. andrewko@medicine.ucsf.edu
Elizabeth Dito
Brian Schillinger
Alan P Venook
Zhidong Xu
Emily K Bergsland
Derrick Wong
Janet Scott
Jimmy Hwang
Margaret A Tempero
UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe role of bevacizumab, a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody directed against vascular endothelial growth factor, in the treatment of pancreatic cancer remains unclear. The objectives of this study were to determine safety and efficacy in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer receiving bevacizumab in combination with fixed-dose rate (FDR) gemcitabine and low-dose cisplatin.

methodsEligible patients received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 at FDR infusion (10 mg/m(2) per minute), cisplatin 20 mg/m(2), and bevacizumab 10 mg/kg, on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Patients were monitored by computed tomography scans every two cycles and monthly serum CA19-9 measurements.

resultsOf 52 patients eligible for analysis, ten (19.2%) had an unconfirmed response and 30 (57.7%) had stable disease. Of 35 patients with elevated baseline CA19-9 levels, 20 (57.1%) had > or = 50% biomarker decline during treatment. Median time to tumor progression was 6.6 months and median survival was 8.2 months (estimated 1-year survival, 36%). Grade 3/4 toxicities possibly related to bevacizumab included thromboembolic events (15.1%), hypertension (13.2%), gastrointestinal bleeding (9.4%), cardiac events (7.5%), and bowel perforation (5.7%). Plasma vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor levels and circulating tumor cell concentration did not correlate with overall survival, either at baseline or after 2 months of therapy.

conclusionsThis bevacizumab-containing study regimen is modestly effective in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer, although occasional serious complications may occur. Given the negative results of CALGB 80303, future efforts should be focused on identifying those specific patients who are most likely to benefit from bevacizumab-based therapy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabCisplatinDeoxycytidineFemaleGemcitabineHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPancreatic NeoplasmsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabCisplatinDeoxycytidineGemcitabineVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID18379729
OpenAlexW2084555154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.