ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2008
Cerebrospinal fluid compartmental pharmacokinetics of amikacin in neonates.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of flomoxef combined with amikacin in a hollow-fibre infection model for the treatment of neonatal sepsis in low- and middle-income healthcare settings.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2022Article
- Tissue Penetration of Antimicrobials in Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Systematic Review-Part II.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Potential Antibiotics for the Treatment of Neonatal Sepsis Caused by Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria.Paediatric drugs · 2021Review
- Amikacin Combined with Fosfomycin for Treatment of Neonatal Sepsis in the Setting of Highly Prevalent Antimicrobial Resistance.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2021Article
- Pharmacokinetic studies in infants using minimal-risk study designs.Current clinical pharmacology · 2014Review
- Clinical pharmacokinetics of antibacterials in cerebrospinal fluid.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2013Review
- Pharmacokinetics of antibacterial agents in the CSF of children and adolescents.Paediatric drugs · 2013Review
- Quantification of amikacin in bronchial epithelial lining fluid in neonates.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To describe and investigate the covariate effects of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amikacin pharmacokinetics in neonates, CSF samples were prospectively collected from neonates in whom amikacin had been initiated before a diagnostic lumbar puncture was performed. CSF analysis (amikacin concentration, white blood count [WBC], glucose content, and protein concentration) and amikacin therapeutic drug monitoring results (peak and trough concentrations) in serum were recorded. Correlations (Spearman rank) between the CSF amikacin concentration and the CSF WBC and glucose and protein concentration were investigated. There were 44 CSF amikacin concentrations and 83 serum samples available from 43 neonates (mean postmenstrual age, 36 weeks [range, 26 to 41 weeks]; mean weight, 2.43 kg [range, 0.87 to 3.86 kg]). The median time interval between initiation of amikacin administration and CSF sampling was 25 h (range, 2.5 to 93.7 h). The median amikacin concentration in the CSF was 1.08 mg/liter (range, 0.34 to 2.65 mg/liter), and the mean trough and peak amikacin concentrations in serum were 3.8 +/- 2.5 mg/liter and 35.7 +/- 5.9 mg/liter, respectively. A correlation between CSF amikacin and CSF protein contents (P < 0.01, r = 0.41, 95% confidence interval = 0.13 to 0.63) but not between CSF WBC and CSF glucose was documented. A two-compartment (central and CSF) linear disposition model was used to estimate population pharmacokinetics. The half time for equilibration (T(eq)) between serum and CSF compartments was used as a measure of blood-brain barrier permeability. The T(eq) was 7.58 h (coefficient of variation [CV] = 49.1%) with a partition coefficient of 0.103 (CV = 26.4%). There was no relationship between the T(eq) and CSF WBC, CSF glucose content, or CSF protein content.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.