Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18378703›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2008

In vitro selection and characterization of ceftobiprole-resistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Ritu Banerjee, Michael Gretes, Li Basuino, Natalie Strynadka, Henry F Chambers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Identification ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Mechanisms of action and antimicrobial activity of ceftobiprole.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. PBP4 Mediates β-Lactam Resistance by Altered Function.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Antimicrobial activity of ceftaroline against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates collected in 2013-2014 at the Geneva University Hospitals.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ritu BanerjeeDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, 500 Parnassus Ave., MU407E, San Francisco, CA 94143-0136, USA. Banerjeer@peds.ucsf.edu
Michael Gretes
Li Basuino
Natalie Strynadka
Henry F Chambers

Funding

NICHD Institutional Training for PediatriciansT32HD044331 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FERRIERO, DONNA M. · 2003 to 2012
$2.5M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNICHD NIH HHS T32 HD044331
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is resistant to beta-lactam antibiotics because it expresses penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP2a), a low-affinity penicillin-binding protein. An investigational broad-spectrum cephalosporin, ceftobiprole (BPR), binds PBP2a with high affinity and is active against MRSA. We hypothesized that BPR resistance could be mediated by mutations in mecA, the gene encoding PBP2a. We selected BPR-resistant mutants by passage in high-volume broth cultures containing subinhibitory concentrations of BPR. We used strain COLnex (which lacks chromosomal mecA) transformed with pAW8 (a plasmid vector only), pYK20 (a plasmid carrying wild-type mecA), or pYK21 (a plasmid carrying a mutant mecA gene corresponding to five PBP2a mutations). All strains became resistant to BPR by day 9 of passaging, but MICs continued to increase until day 21. MICs increased 256-fold (from 1 to 256 microg/ml) for pAW8, 32-fold (from 4 to 128 microg/ml) for pYK20, and 8-fold (from 16 to 128 mug/ml) for pYK21. Strains carrying wild-type or mutant mecA developed six (pYK20 transformants) or four (pYK21 transformants) new mutations in mecA. The transformation of COLnex with a mecA mutant plasmid conferred BPR resistance, and the loss of mecA converted resistant strains into susceptible ones. Modeling studies predicted that several of the mecA mutations altered BPR binding; other mutations may have mediated resistance by influencing interactions with other proteins. Multiple mecA mutations were associated with BPR resistance in MRSA. BPR resistance also developed in the strain lacking mecA, suggesting a role for chromosomal genes.

Indexed as

Selection, GeneticAnti-Bacterial AgentsCephalosporinsCulture MediaDrug Resistance, BacterialHumansMethicillin ResistanceModels, MolecularMutationPenicillin-Binding ProteinsSerial PassageStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsceftobiproleCephalosporinsCulture MediaPenicillin-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18378703
PMCPMC2415812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.