Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18378512›Full record

ArticleJournal of pediatric psychology2009

Supporting family adaptation to presymptomatic and "untreatable" conditions in an era of expanded newborn screening.

Donald B Bailey, F Daniel Armstrong, Alex R Kemper, Debra Skinner, Steven F Warren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pediatric psychology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Communicating a Positive Result at Newborn Screening and Parental Distress.International journal of neonatal screening · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Foundation of the Newborn Screening Translational Research Network and its tools for research.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Parental preferences toward genomic sequencing for non-medically actionable conditions in children: a discrete-choice experiment.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Disclosing Secondary Findings from Pediatric Sequencing to Families: Considering the "Benefit to Families".The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Donald B BaileyRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194, USA. dbailey@rti.org
F Daniel Armstrong
Alex R Kemper
Debra Skinner
Steven F Warren

Funding

UNC MRDD Research CenterP30HD003110 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PIVEN, JOSEPH · 1985 to 2012
$28.7M
Identifying Newborns with Fragile X: Planning GrantR21HD043616 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BAILEY, DONALD B · 2003 to 2005
$683k
ELSI Scale-Up: Large Sample Gene Discovery &DisclosureP20HG003387 · NHGRI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BAILEY, DONALD B · 2004 to 2006
$674k
EARLY HEARING DETETION, DIAGNOSIS AND INTERVENTION (EHDDI) TRACKUR3DD000408 · DD · COMMISSION/CHILD/SPECIAL HLTH CARE NEEDS · PI KING, MICHELLE · 2008 to 2010
$443k
NCBDD CDC HHS UR3 DD000408NHGRI NIH HHS P20 HG003387NHGRI NIH HHS P20-HG003387NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD003110NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD043616NICHD NIH HHS R21-HD043616
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAs technology advances, newborn screening will be possible for conditions not screened today. With an expansion of screening, strategies will be needed to support family adaptation to unexpected and possibly uncertain genetic information provided shortly after birth.

methodAlthough candidate conditions for expanded newborn screening will typically be associated with increased morbidity or mortality, for most there is no proven medical treatment that must be implemented quickly. Many will have clinical features that gradually emerge and for which the severity of impact is not predictable. Parents will seek guidance on information, support, and treatment possibilities. This article summarizes issues evoked by expanded newborn screening and suggests strategies for supporting families of identified children.

resultsWe propose four components necessary to support family adaptation to pre-symptomatic and "untreatable" conditions in an era of expanded newborn screening: (1) accurate and understandable information; (2) formal and informal support; (3) active surveillance; and (4) general and targeted interventions. We argue that no condition is "untreatable" and that a well-designed program of prevention and support has the potential to maximize benefit and minimize harm.

conclusionsPediatric psychologists can play important roles in an era of expanded newborn screening by helping families understand genetic information, make informed decisions about genetic testing, and cope with the potential psychosocial consequences of genetic information.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalReferral and ConsultationSocial SupportCooperative BehaviorGenetic Association StudiesGenetic CounselingGenetic Diseases, InbornHumansInfant, NewbornInterdisciplinary CommunicationNeonatal ScreeningParentsPatient Care TeamPatient-Centered CarePrognosis

Identifiers

PMID18378512
PMCPMC2722102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.