Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18378471›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of learning and memory2008

Nicotinic modulation of tone-evoked responses in auditory cortex reflects the strength of prior auditory learning.

Kevin Liang, Bonnie Sue Poytress, Norman M Weinberger, Raju Metherate

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of learning and memory, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cholinergic modulation in the vertebrate auditory pathway.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Cholinergic modulation of sensory perception and plasticity.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2023
    Review
  6. Nicotinic Receptor Subunit Distribution in Auditory Cortex: Impact of Aging on Receptor Number and Function.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Cholinergic Modulation of Stimulus-Specific Adaptation in the Inferior Colliculus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Cortical cholinergic input is required for normal auditory perception and experience-dependent plasticity in adult ferrets.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Nicotinic filtering of sensory processing in auditory cortex.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2012
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Stability of thalamocortical synaptic transmission across awake brain states.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kevin LiangDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, Center for Hearing Research, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Bonnie Sue Poytress
Norman M Weinberger
Raju Metherate
University of California, Irvine · US

Funding

UC Irvine Core Center for Hearing and Communication ResearchP30DC008369 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI METHERATE, RAJU · 2007 to 2016
$3.3M
FUNCTIONS OF NICOTINE RECEPTORS IN SENSORY NEOCORTEXR01DA012929 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI METHERATE, RAJU · 2000 to 2012
$2.4M
MOLECULAR GENETICS OF A SYNDROME WITH HEARING IMPAIRMENTR01DC002398 · NIDCD · ALLEGHENY-SINGER RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI POST, JAMES CHRISTOPHER · 2000 to 2004
$1.6M
Cellular Mechanisms of Aditory Cortex FunctionR01DC002967 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI METHERATE, RAJU · 2003 to 2007
$913k
CELLULAR STUDY OF AUDITORY CORTEX FUNCTIONR29DC002967 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE · PI METHERATE, RAJU · 1997 to 2001
$226k
Nicotinic Modulation of Auditory Cortex DevelopmentF31DC008605 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI LIANG, KEVIN · 2006 to 2007
$61k
GENETIC MAPPING OF A SYNDROME WITH HEARING IMPAIRMENTR29DC002398 · NIDCD · CHILDREN'S HOSP PITTSBURGH/UPMC HLTH SYS · PI POST, JAMES CHRISTOPHER · 1994 to 1998
–
CELLULAR MECHANISMS OF AUDITORY CORTEX FUNCTIONR55DC002967 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE · PI METHERATE, RAJU · 1996 to 1996
–
NIDA NIH HHS DA12929NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA012929NIDCD NIH HHS DC 008605NIDCD NIH HHS DC02398NIDCD NIH HHS DC02967NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC008605NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC008369NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC002398NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC002967NIDCD NIH HHS R29 DC002398NIDCD NIH HHS R29 DC002967
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) contribute to sensory-cognitive function, as demonstrated by evidence that nAChR activation enhances, and nAChR blockade impairs, neural processing of sensory stimuli and sensory-cognitive behavior. To better understand the relationship between nAChR function and behavior, here we compare the strength of nAChR-mediated physiology in individual animals to their prior auditory behavioral performance. Adult rats were trained on an auditory-cued, active avoidance task over 4 days and classified as "good," "intermediate" or "poor" performers based on their initial rate of learning and eventual level of performance. Animals were then anesthetized, and tone-evoked local field potentials (LFPs) recorded in layer 4 of auditory cortex (ACx) before and after a test dose of nicotine (0.7mg/kg, s.c.) or saline. In "good" performers, nicotine enhanced LFP amplitude and decreased response threshold to characteristic frequency (CF) stimuli, yet had opposite effects (decreased amplitude, increased threshold) on responses to spectrally distant stimuli; i.e., cortical receptive fields became more selective for CF stimuli. In contrast, nicotine had little effect on LFP amplitude in "intermediate" or "poor" performing animals. Nicotine did, however, reduce LFP onset latency in all three groups, indicating that all received an effective dose of the drug. Our findings suggest that nicotinic regulation of cortical receptive fields may be a distinguishing feature of the best-performing animals, and may facilitate sensory-related learning by enhancing receptive field selectivity.

Indexed as

AcetylcholineAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory CortexAvoidance LearningBehavior, AnimalEvoked Potentials, AuditoryMaleNicotineNicotinic AgonistsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptors, NicotinicAcetylcholineNicotineNicotinic AgonistsReceptors, Nicotinic

Identifiers

PMID18378471
PMCPMC2464281
OpenAlexW2146445551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.