Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18377806›Full record

ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2007

Positioning biologic therapy for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.

Fernando S Velayos, William J Sandborn

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fernando S VelayosCenter for Crohn's and Colitis, University of California, San Francisco, 2330 Post Street Suite 610, San Francisco, California 94115, USA. Fernando.Velayos@ucsf.edu
William J Sandborn
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade, the introduction of biologic agents such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha and alpha4 integrin leukocyte adhesion molecule inhibitors has provided new and effective treatment options for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Recent debates have centered on where biologics should be positioned within the current treatment strategy so as to maximize efficacy while balancing risk. This review highlights the current position biologics hold relative to conventional therapies within the current "step-up" treatment strategy. It also critically appraises emerging data, testing the hypothesis that positioning biologics early in the IBD treatment algorithm ("top-down" strategy) results in superior outcomes compared with the current step-up strategy, in which biologics are used only in patients failing conventional therapies or who are steroid dependent.

Indexed as

Biological TherapyAdalimumabAlgorithmsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidCertolizumab PegolColitis, UlcerativeCombined Modality TherapyCrohn DiseaseDisease ManagementHumansImmunoglobulin Fab FragmentsImmunologic FactorsInfliximabAdalimumabAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsCertolizumab PegolImmunoglobulin Fab FragmentsImmunologic FactorsInfliximabNatalizumabPolyethylene GlycolsTumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID18377806
OpenAlexW2041967501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.