ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2007
Current and future diagnostic approaches: from serologies to imaging.
Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Utility of four machine learning approaches for identifying ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Does neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predict active ulcerative colitis?Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2015Article
- Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio: a controversial marker in predicting Crohn's disease severity.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2015Article
- Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of disease severity in ulcerative colitis.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2013Article
- Mean platelet volume: a controversial marker of disease activity in Crohn's disease.European journal of medical research · 2012Article
- Noninvasive methods in evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease: where do we stand now? An update.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2010Review
- Cancer antigen 125 levels in inflammatory bowel diseases.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2009Article
- New serological biomarkers of inflammatory bowel disease.World journal of gastroenterology · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in serologic markers and imaging modalities continue to revolutionize diagnostic approaches to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Autoimmune and antimicrobial antibodies demonstrate diagnostic value in those patients with a moderate pretest probability of disease. Emerging data also support the use of antimicrobial antibody levels as a predictive tool for small bowel complications and the need for future surgery. In addition to being a prognostic marker in patients with acute severe colitis, serum C-reactive protein has been shown to correlate with clinical, endoscopic, and radiologic measures of disease activity. Capsule endoscopy and double-balloon endoscopy allow for visualization of the entire small bowel, and double-balloon endoscopy also has the capability to treat lesions. CT enterography is beginning to replace small bowel follow-through because of its high sensitivity and specificity for disease of the small intestine. Both CT and magnetic resonance enterography detect luminal and extraluminal abnormalities, with MRI serving as a safe imaging option in cases of pregnancy and renal insufficiency. These newer modalities add to the armamentarium clinicians can use for evaluation of IBD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.