ArticleBiophysical journal2008
The relationship between single-channel and whole-cell conductance in the T-type Ca2+ channel CaV3.1.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stochastic calcium mechanisms cause dendritic calcium spike variability.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013Article
- Inhibition of the activation pathway of the T-type calcium channel Ca(V)3.1 by ProTxII.Toxicon : official journal of the International Society on Toxinology · 2010Article
- Evaluation of a two-site, three-barrier model for permeation in Ca(V)3.1 (alpha1G) T-type calcium channels: Ca (2+), Ba (2+), Mg (2+), and Na (+).The Journal of membrane biology · 2010Article
- Transient and big are key features of an invertebrate T-type channel (LCav3) from the central nervous system of Lymnaea stagnalis.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In T-type Ca(2+) channels, macroscopic I(Ba) is usually smaller than I(Ca), but at high Ca(2+) and Ba(2+), single-channel conductance (gamma) is equal. We investigated gamma as a function of divalent concentration and compared it to macroscopic currents using Ca(V)3.1 channels studied under similar experimental conditions (TEA(o) and K(i)). Single-channel current-voltage relationships were nonlinear in a way similar to macroscopic open-channel I/Vs, so divalent gamma was underestimated at depolarized voltages. To estimate divalent gamma, concentration dependence, i(Div), was measured at voltages <-50 mV. Data were well described by Langmuir isotherms with gamma(max)(Ca(2+)) of 9.5 +/- 0.4 pS and gamma(max)(Ba(2+)) of 10.3 +/- 0.5 pS. Apparent K(M) was lower for Ca(2+) (2.3 +/- 0.7 mM) than for Ba(2+) (7.9 +/- 1.3 mM). A subconductance state with an amplitude 70% that of the main state was observed, the relative occupancy of which increased with increasing Ca(2+). As predicted by gamma, macroscopic G(maxCa) was larger than G(maxBa) at 5 mM (G(max)Ca(2+)/Ba:(2+)1.43 +/- 0.14) and similar at 60 mM (G(max)Ca(2+)/Ba:(2+)1.10 +/- 0.02). However, over the range of activation, I(Ca) was larger than I(Ba) under both conditions. This was a consequence of the fact that V(rev) was more negative for I(Ba) than for I(Ca), so that the driving force determining I(Ba) was smaller than that determining I(Ca) over the range of potentials in standard current-voltage relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.