Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18375178›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of medical microbiology : IJMM2008

Bacillus anthracis: balancing innocent research with dual-use potential.

Michael J Hudson, Wolfgang Beyer, Reinhard Böhm, Antonio Fasanella, Giuliano Garofolo, Robert Golinski, Pierre L Goossens, Ulrike Hahn, Bassam Hallis, Annemarie King and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of medical microbiology : IJMM, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Toxins · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evaluation ofJournal of veterinary science · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Genetic vaccines for anthrax based on recombinant adeno-associated virus vectors.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Michael J HudsonHealth Protection Agency, Porton Down, Salisbury, UK.
Wolfgang Beyer
Reinhard Böhm
Antonio Fasanella
Giuliano Garofolo
Robert Golinski
Pierre L Goossens
Ulrike Hahn
Bassam Hallis
Annemarie King
Michèle Mock
Cesare Montecucco
Amanda Ozin
Fiorella Tonello
Stefan H E Kaufmann

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthrax Euronet, a Coordination Action of the EU 6th Framework Programme, was designed to strengthen networking activities between anthrax research groups in Europe and to harmonise protocols for testing anthrax vaccines and therapeutics. Inevitably, the project also addressed aspects of the current political issues of biosecurity and dual-use research, i.e. research into agents of important diseases of man, livestock or agriculture that could be used as agents of bioterrorism. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the biology of Bacillus anthracis, of the pathogenesis, epidemiology and diagnosis of anthrax, as well as vaccine and therapeutic intervention strategies. The proposed requirement for a code of conduct for working with dual-use agents such as the anthrax bacillus is also discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnthraxAnthrax VaccinesBacillus anthracisHumansVirulence FactorsAnthrax VaccinesVirulence Factors

Identifiers

PMID18375178
PMCPMC7106442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.