Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18373841›Full record

ReviewBMC infectious diseases2008

Rectal artemisinins for malaria: a review of efficacy and safety from individual patient data in clinical studies.

Melba Gomes, Isabela Ribeiro, Marian Warsame, Harin Karunajeewa, Max Petzold

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC infectious diseases, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pre-referral rectal artesunate for severe malaria.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  2. Malaria: severe, life-threatening.BMJ clinical evidence · 2011
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Rectal artesunate for severe malaria, implementation research, Zambia.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Observational
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. The parasite clearance curve.Malaria journal · 2011
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Melba GomesUNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, Geneva 27, Switzerland. gomesm@who.int
Isabela Ribeiro
Marian Warsame
Harin Karunajeewa
Max Petzold
Karolinska Institutet · SEDrugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative · CHUniversity of Western Australia · AUWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRectal administration of artemisinin derivatives has potential for early treatment for severe malaria in remote settings where injectable antimalarial therapy may not be feasible. Preparations available include artesunate, artemisinin, artemether and dihydroartemisinin. However each may have different pharmacokinetic properties and more information is needed to determine optimal dose and comparative efficacy with each another and with conventional parenteral treatments for severe malaria.

methodsIndividual patient data from 1167 patients in 15 clinical trials of rectal artemisinin derivative therapy (artesunate, artemisinin and artemether) were pooled in order to compare the rapidity of clearance of Plasmodium falciparum parasitaemia and the incidence of reported adverse events with each treatment. Data from patients who received comparator treatment (parenteral artemisinin derivative or quinine) were also included. Primary endpoints included percentage reductions in parasitaemia at 12 and 24 hours. A parasite reduction of >90% at 24 hours was defined as parasitological success.

resultsArtemisinin and artesunate treatment cleared parasites more rapidly than parenteral quinine during the first 24 hours of treatment. A single higher dose of rectal artesunate treatment was five times more likely to achieve >90% parasite reductions at 24 hours than were multiple lower doses of rectal artesunate, or a single lower dose administration of rectal artemether.

conclusionArtemisinin and artesunate suppositories rapidly eliminate parasites and appear to be safe. There are less data on artemether and dihydroartemisinin suppositories. The more rapid parasite clearance of single high-dose regimens suggests that achieving immediate high drug concentrations may be the optimal strategy.

Indexed as

Administration, RectalAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsAntimalarialsArtemisininsChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalariaMiddle AgedParasitemiaAntimalarialsArtemisinins

Identifiers

PMID18373841
PMCPMC2364627
OpenAlexW2166506701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.