ReviewClinical cardiology2007
Novel therapeutic approaches to treating chronic angina in the setting of chronic ischemic heart disease.
Review in Clinical cardiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Antagonist molecules in the treatment of angina.Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy · 2013Review
- Stable angina pectoris: antianginal therapies and future directions.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pharmacologic therapy to alleviate symptoms in chronic angina has been enhanced by the recent approval of several novel compounds that complement the traditional approach using beta-adrenergic blocking drugs, calcium antagonists, and long-acting nitrates. In the United States, ranolazine, a drug that inhibits late I(Na), was approved for patients with chronic angina that remain symptomatic on beta-blockers, calcium antagonists, or long-acting nitrates, on the basis of an acceptable safety profile and efficacy in several randomized placebo controlled studies. A slight increase in the QT interval is observed (<10 ms on average) at the maximum approved dose of 1,000 mg twice daily. Therefore, an ECG should be acquired at baseline and during follow-up, and the drug should not be used in patients with QT prolongation or those who are on QT prolonging drugs unless longer term randomized outcome data demonstrates no excess risk. The MERLIN trial of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE ACS) randomized 6,560 patients to assess the potential benefit of ranolazine in reducing the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and recurrent ischemia, with results expected in 2007. In Europe, ivabradine, a drug that inhibits the hyperpolarization-activated mixed sodium/potassium inward I(f) current, which slows the rest and exercise heart rate, was approved in 2005. Ivabradine at a dose of 10 mg twice daily has been shown to have similar efficacy to amlodipine 10 mg once daily or atenolol 100 mg once daily in alleviating chronic angina symptoms. In this review, several other novel investigational approaches are presented and patient selection considerations for the most recent approved drugs for chronic angina are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.