SynthesisGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2008
Citrus fruit intake and stomach cancer risk: a quantitative systematic review.
Synthesis in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 30 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Different types of fruit intake and colorectal cancer risk: A meta-analysis of observational studies.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Pooled it
- Helicobacter pylori Infection and Risk of Gastric Cancer in Korea: A Quantitative Systematic Review.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2016Pooled it
- Dietary intakes of citrus fruit and risk of gastric cancer incidence: an adaptive meta-analysis of cohort studies.Epidemiology and health · 2016Pooled it
- Hormonal Replacement Therapy and the Risk of Lung Cancer in Women: An Adaptive Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2015Pooled it
- Citrus Fruit Intake Substantially Reduces the Risk of Esophageal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Epidemiologic Studies.Medicine · 2015Pooled it
- Hormone Replacement Therapy and Risk of Breast Cancer in Korean Women: A Quantitative Systematic Review.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2015Pooled it
- Matching traditional Chinese medicine and western medicine-based research: Advanced nutraceutical development for proactive gastric cancer prevention.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Review
- Significant Association ofBritish journal of biomedical science · 2022Article
- Phytochemicals for the Prevention and Treatment of Gastric Cancer: Effects and Mechanisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Epidemiology of gastric cancer: global trends, risk factors and prevention.Przeglad gastroenterologiczny · 2019Review
- The Role of Menopausal Hormone Therapy in Reducing All-cause Mortality in Postmenopausal Women Younger than 60 Years: An Adaptive Meta-analysis.Journal of menopausal medicine · 2018Article
- Can a gastric cancer risk survey identify high-risk patients for endoscopic screening? A pilot study.The Journal of surgical research · 2018Article
- Identification and Evaluation of Cytotoxicity of Peptide Liposome Incorporated Citron Extracts in an in Vitro System.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Article
- Analysis of volatile fraction of sweetie (Monatshefte fur chemie · 2018Article
- Nature, Nurture, and Cancer Risks: Genetic and Nutritional Contributions to Cancer.Annual review of nutrition · 2017Review
- Fruit and vegetable consumption, Helicobacter pylori antibodies, and gastric cancer risk: A pooled analysis of prospective studies in China, Japan, and Korea.International journal of cancer · 2017Article
- Chemopreventive Agents and Inhibitors of Cancer Hallmarks: May Citrus Offer New Perspectives?Nutrients · 2016Review
- Comparison of methods of extracting information for meta-analysis of observational studies in nutritional epidemiology.Epidemiology and health · 2016Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this systematic review was to investigate the association between dietary intake of citrus fruits and gastric cancer risk.
methodsWe searched electronic databases and the reference lists of publications on diet and stomach cancer studies until April 2007. All of the epidemiological studies that obtained individual data on dietary intake of citrus fruits and presented risk estimates of the association between intake of citrus fruits and risk of stomach cancer were identified and included in this review. Using general variance-based methods, study-specific odds ratio (OR)/ relative risk (RR) and associated confidence interval (CI)/ standard error (SE) for highest versus lowest intake of citrus fruits level were extracted from each article.
resultsFourteen articles, including six hospital-based case-control studies, six community-based case-control studies, and two cohort studies, proved eligible. Overall summary OR using a fixed-effect model showed a 28% reduction in risk of stomach cancer associated with high intake of citrus fruits (summary OR = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.64-0.81; P value <0.0001); results were consistent across studies (I(2) = 0, where I(2) describes the percentage of total variation across studies because of heterogeneity rather than chance). Also, visual inspection of the results did not suggest a publication bias.
conclusionPooled results from observational studies support a protective effect of high citrus fruit intake in the risk of stomach cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18373174What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.