ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2008
Centers speak up: the clinical context for health information technology in the ambulatory care setting.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- A strategic gaming model for health information exchange markets.Health care management science · 2018Article
- A user needs assessment to inform health information exchange design and implementation.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2015Article
- Testing the prospective evaluation of a new healthcare system.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2012Article
- Evaluating electronic referrals for specialty care at a public hospital.Journal of general internal medicine · 2010Article
- Health information technology: integration of clinical workflow into meaningful use of electronic health records.Perspectives in health information managemen · 2010Article
- Creation and evaluation of EMR-based paper clinical summaries to support HIV-care in Uganda, Africa.International journal of medical informatics · 2010Article
- Not perfect, but better: primary care providers' experiences with electronic referrals in a safety net health system.Journal of general internal medicine · 2009Article
- The role of systems factors in implementing health information technology.Journal of general internal medicine · 2008Article
- Moving health information technology forward.Journal of general internal medicine · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinicians in ambulatory care settings are increasingly called upon to use health information technology (health IT) to improve practice efficiency and performance. Successful adoption of health IT requires an understanding of how clinical tasks and workflows will be affected; yet this has not been well described.
objectiveTo describe how health IT functions within a clinical context.
designQualitative study, using in-depth, semi-structured interviews.
participantsExecutives and staff at 4 community health centers, 3 health center networks, and 1 large primary care organization. APPROACH: Transcribed audio-recorded interviews, analyzed using the constant comparative method.
resultsSystematic characterization of clinical context identified 6 primary clinical domains. These included results management, intra-clinic communication, patient education and outreach, inter-clinic coordination, medication management, and provider education and feedback. We generated clinical process diagrams to characterize these domains. Participants suggested that underlying workflows for these domains must be fully operational to ensure successful deployment of health IT.
conclusionsUnderstanding the clinical context is a necessary precursor to successful deployment of health IT. Process diagrams can serve as the basis for EHR certification, to identify challenges, to measure health IT adoption, or to develop curricular content regarding the role of health IT in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.