Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18373132›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2008

Centers speak up: the clinical context for health information technology in the ambulatory care setting.

Michael G Leu, Ming Cheung, Tashonna R Webster, Leslie Curry, Elizabeth H Bradley, Judith Fifield, Helen Burstin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Testing the prospective evaluation of a new healthcare system.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2012
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Moving health information technology forward.Journal of general internal medicine · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Michael G LeuChildren's Hospital and Regional Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98105, USA. michael.leu@seattlechildrens.org
Ming Cheung
Tashonna R Webster
Leslie Curry
Elizabeth H Bradley
Judith Fifield
Helen Burstin
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · USCommunity Health Center · USNational Quality Forum · USSeattle Children's Hospital · USUConn Health · USUniversity of Connecticut · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinicians in ambulatory care settings are increasingly called upon to use health information technology (health IT) to improve practice efficiency and performance. Successful adoption of health IT requires an understanding of how clinical tasks and workflows will be affected; yet this has not been well described.

objectiveTo describe how health IT functions within a clinical context.

designQualitative study, using in-depth, semi-structured interviews.

participantsExecutives and staff at 4 community health centers, 3 health center networks, and 1 large primary care organization. APPROACH: Transcribed audio-recorded interviews, analyzed using the constant comparative method.

resultsSystematic characterization of clinical context identified 6 primary clinical domains. These included results management, intra-clinic communication, patient education and outreach, inter-clinic coordination, medication management, and provider education and feedback. We generated clinical process diagrams to characterize these domains. Participants suggested that underlying workflows for these domains must be fully operational to ensure successful deployment of health IT.

conclusionsUnderstanding the clinical context is a necessary precursor to successful deployment of health IT. Process diagrams can serve as the basis for EHR certification, to identify challenges, to measure health IT adoption, or to develop curricular content regarding the role of health IT in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Care Information SystemsDiffusion of InnovationPractice Patterns, Physicians'Administrative PersonnelBiomedical TechnologyCommunity Health CentersHumansInterviews as TopicMedical Order Entry SystemsMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedUnited States

Identifiers

PMID18373132
PMCPMC2359517
OpenAlexW2052588032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.