Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18372291›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2008

Human amygdala sensitivity to the pupil size of others.

K E Demos, W M Kelley, S L Ryan, F C Davis, P J Whalen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pupil mimicry promotes trust through the theory-of-mind network.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Dissecting the role of amygdala reactivity in antisocial behavior in a sample of young, low-income, urban men.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

K E DemosDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA. kathryn.e.demos@dartmouth.edu
W M Kelley
S L Ryan
F C Davis
P J Whalen

Funding

Prefrontal-Amygdala Interactions in Social LearningR01MH080716 · NIMH · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI WHALEN, PAUL J · 2007 to 2016
$3.6M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH080716PHS HHS 069315PHS HHS 080716
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stimulation of the amygdala produces pupil dilation in animal and human subjects. The present study examined whether the amygdala is sensitive to variations in the pupil size of others. Male subjects underwent event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging while passively viewing unfamiliar female faces whose pupils were either unaltered (natural variations in large and small pupils) or altered to be larger or smaller than their original size. Results revealed that the right amygdala and left amygdala/substantia innominata were sensitive to the pupil size of others, exhibiting increased activity for faces with relatively large pupils. Upon debrief, no subject reported being aware that the pupils had been manipulated. These results suggest a function for the amygdala in the detection of changes in pupil size, an index of arousal and/or interest on the part of a conspecific, even in the absence of explicit knowledge.

Indexed as

Facial ExpressionAdolescentAmygdalaArousalCuesFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansKnowledgeMalePupilVisual AcuityVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID18372291
PMCPMC2583162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.