Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18371582›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology

Underestimation of coronary artery disease with SPECT perfusion imaging.

George A Beller

Abstract readEditorial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Absolute myocardial blood flows derived by dynamic CZT scan vs invasive fractional flow reserve: Correlation and accuracy.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Reconciling discordant myocardial perfusion imaging and coronary angiography.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Myocardial blood flow: Putting it into clinical perspective.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2016
    Article
  12. Perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance and fractional flow reserve in patients with angiographic multi-vessel coronary artery disease.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2016
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Negative predictive value of SPECT for the occurrence of MACE in a medium-sized clinic in the Netherlands.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2014
    Article
  17. Does quantification of myocardial flow reserve using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography facilitate detection of multivessel coronary artery disease?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2012
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Noninvasive stress testing of myocardial perfusion defects: head-to-head comparison of thallium-201 SPECT to MRI perfusion.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

George A Beller

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsFalse Negative ReactionsHumansPerfusionTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonVentricular Dysfunction, Left

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.