Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18371194›Full record

ReviewBreast cancer research : BCR2008

Evaluation of the current knowledge limitations in breast cancer research: a gap analysis.

Alastair Thompson, Keith Brennan, Angela Cox, Julia Gee, Diana Harcourt, Adrian Harris, Michelle Harvie, Ingunn Holen, Anthony Howell, Robert Nicholson and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Bridging the Gap: Scenario Planning for Science and Technology in Breast Cancer.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Role of natural compounds in preventing and treating breast cancer.Frontiers in bioscience (Scholar edition) · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Alastair ThompsonDepartment of Surgery and Molecular Oncology, University of Dundee, Ninewells Avenue, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK. a.m.thompson@dundee.ac.uk
Keith Brennan
Angela Cox
Julia Gee
Diana Harcourt
Adrian Harris
Michelle Harvie
Ingunn Holen
Anthony Howell
Robert Nicholson
Michael Steel
Charles Streuli
University of Manchester · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GBCardiff University · GBTenovus Cancer Care · GBUniversity of Dundee · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of St Andrews · GBUniversity of the West of England · GBWellcome Centre for Cell-Matrix Research · GBWythenshawe Hospital · GB

Funding

Breast Cancer Now 2004NOV49
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA gap analysis was conducted to determine which areas of breast cancer research, if targeted by researchers and funding bodies, could produce the greatest impact on patients.

methodsFifty-six Breast Cancer Campaign grant holders and prominent UK breast cancer researchers participated in a gap analysis of current breast cancer research. Before, during and following the meeting, groups in seven key research areas participated in cycles of presentation, literature review and discussion. Summary papers were prepared by each group and collated into this position paper highlighting the research gaps, with recommendations for action.

resultsGaps were identified in all seven themes. General barriers to progress were lack of financial and practical resources, and poor collaboration between disciplines. Critical gaps in each theme included: (1) genetics (knowledge of genetic changes, their effects and interactions); (2) initiation of breast cancer (how developmental signalling pathways cause ductal elongation and branching at the cellular level and influence stem cell dynamics, and how their disruption initiates tumour formation); (3) progression of breast cancer (deciphering the intracellular and extracellular regulators of early progression, tumour growth, angiogenesis and metastasis); (4) therapies and targets (understanding who develops advanced disease); (5) disease markers (incorporating intelligent trial design into all studies to ensure new treatments are tested in patient groups stratified using biomarkers); (6) prevention (strategies to prevent oestrogen-receptor negative tumours and the long-term effects of chemoprevention for oestrogen-receptor positive tumours); (7) psychosocial aspects of cancer (the use of appropriate psychosocial interventions, and the personal impact of all stages of the disease among patients from a range of ethnic and demographic backgrounds).

conclusionThrough recommendations to address these gaps with future research, the long-term benefits to patients will include: better estimation of risk in families with breast cancer and strategies to reduce risk; better prediction of drug response and patient prognosis; improved tailoring of treatments to patient subgroups and development of new therapeutic approaches; earlier initiation of treatment; more effective use of resources for screening populations; and an enhanced experience for people with or at risk of breast cancer and their families. The challenge to funding bodies and researchers in all disciplines is to focus on these gaps and to drive advances in knowledge into improvements in patient care.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchBreast NeoplasmsAngiogenesis InhibitorsAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingCell Transformation, NeoplasticClinical Trials as TopicDisease Models, AnimalDisease ProgressionEvidence-Based MedicineExerciseFeeding BehaviorFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID18371194
PMCPMC2397525
OpenAlexW2087662692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.