Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18370557›Full record

ArticleClinical drug investigation1998

Intraindividual differences in pain relief and functional improvement in osteoarthritis with diclofenac or tramadol.

K Pavelka, Z Pelisková, H Stehlíková, S Ratcliffe, C Repas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical drug investigation, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Tramadol for osteoarthritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Opioids for chronic noncancer pain: a meta-analysis of effectiveness and side effects.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2006
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Chronic non-cancer pain: Focus on once-daily tramadol formulations.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2007
    Article
  10. Release of diclofenac sodium from polylactide-co-glycolide 80/20 rods.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2006
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Clinical pharmacology of tramadol.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2004
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

K PavelkaInstitute of Rheumatology, Na slupi 4, Praha, Czech Republic.
Z Pelisková
H Stehlíková
S Ratcliffe
C Repas
Grünenthal Group (Germany) · DEInstitute of Rheumatology · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate how individual patients with painful osteoarthritis (OA) respond to the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) diclofenac and the centrally acting analgesic tramadol when individual on-demand dose titration is allowed. In addition, we studied whether the differences in the mode of action of the different analgesics were important for functional outcome in OA patients.

methodsThis was performed as a double-blind, crossover, randomised study in 60 patients with OA of the hip (19 patients) or knee (41 patients) without clinical joint inflammation. Patients received either tramadol (50 to 100mg up to three times daily, on demand) for 4 weeks, followed by diclofenac (25 to 50mg up to three times daily, on demand) for 4 weeks, or vice versa. The multidimensional 'Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index' (WOMAC) questionnaire (pain, stiffness and functional impairment) was used to assess the effect of the drugs on pain and functional capability.

results54 patients completed both study periods. The mean (+/- SD) daily dose of tramadol consumed was 164.8mg (+/- 54.1mg) and that of diclofenac was 86.9mg (+/- 21.4mg). Both treatments modestly improved median pain intensity, paralleled by an improvement in functional parameters, and there were no statistically significant differences between the groups. However, individual treatment effects varied greatly, and within individual patients there were considerable variations in analgesic effectiveness between the two treatments. Consistently, pain relief correlated linearly with functional improvement. More patients reported adverse events with tramadol than with diclofenac (20 vs 3%, p = 0.0056), but there was no difference in adverse event-related withdrawals (p = 0.69).

conclusionOA patients' response to analgesic treatment was highly individual and the response to one drug was not predictive of that to another drug. A significant proportion of patients were not treated satisfactorily with diclofenac or tramadol alone. The results obtained from a descriptive analysis of group effects (means, medians) were inappropriate for drawing conclusions on individual treatment benefits. Improvement of functional capability apparently was a consequence of pain relief. Effective pain relief should therefore be the main therapeutic goal in patients with OA where inflammation is less prominent.

Identifiers

PMID18370557
OpenAlexW2087705206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.