ArticleClinical drug investigation1998
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of newer oral cephalosporins: implications for treatment of community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections.
Article in Clinical drug investigation, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contrasting pH optima of β-lactamases CTX-M and CMY influenceApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- Ceftriaxone: an update of its use in the management of community-acquired and nosocomial infections.Drugs · 2002Review
- Cefpodoxime proxetil: a review of its use in the management of bacterial infections in paediatric patients.Paediatric drugs · 2001Review
- Cefuroxime axetil: an updated review of its use in the management of bacterial infections.Drugs · 2001Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Full knowledge of the inter-relationships between pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics is important in choosing an appropriate antibiotic, determining its optimal dosage regimen, and predicting which pharmacokinetic parameter(s) should best correlate with clinical efficacy in the treatment of community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs). Pharmacodynamics of antibiotics deal with the time-course of drug activity and mechanisms of action of drugs on bacteria. In particular, the bactericidal activity of beta-lactams such as the cephalosporins is dependent upon the time that serum concentrations remain above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of a given organism. A significant linear correlation exists between time above MIC (T > MIC) and time to eradication of bacteria from respiratory secretions. Therefore, the goal of a dosage regimen for antibiotics of this type is to maximise the time during which the organism is exposed to the drug, since the bactericidal activity correlates more with duration than with magnitude of dose. Most infections occur in tissue rather than in the blood. Thus, appropriate antibiotic therapy requires achievement of significant concentrations of antibiotics at the site of infection for long enough to eliminate the invading pathogen. At present, few data on the pulmonary disposition of newer oral cephalosporins are available in literature; they are generally limited to the evaluation of penetration of the antibiotic into the sputum and only for part of the dosage interval. The inadequacy of data limits the possibility of a pharmacodynamic investigation. The scarcity of data on the postantibiotic effect of these antimicrobial agents is also a problem. Therefore, at present, it is extremely difficult to prescribe a newer oral cephalosporin for the treatment of a LRTI in accordance with an authentic pharmacodynamic approach. This new approach, which results from the integration of bacteriological characteristics in in vivo pharmacokinetic studies, is extremely important in determining the choice of the appropriate antibiotic and the dosage regimen for treating LRTIs. An oral cephalosporin with good potency as well as a favourable pharmacokinetic profile and that permits concentrations higher than the MIC(90)s of Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Moraxella catarrhalis for almost the entire validated dosage interval in bronchial secretions, can potentially be considered the first choice.
Identifiers
18370555What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.