Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18370443›Full record

ReviewDrugs2008

Dalbavancin.

Vanessa R Anderson, Gillian M Keating

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Developments in Glycopeptide Antibiotics.ACS infectious diseases · 2018
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Peripheral modifications of [Ψ[CHProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Vanessa R AndersonWolters Kluwer Health, Adis, Auckland, New Zealand. demail@adis.co.nz
Gillian M Keating
Wolters Kluwer Health · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dalbavancin is a semisynthetic glycopeptide antibacterial agent that is active against Gram-positive bacteria associated with complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSIs). It is administered as a two-dose regimen intravenously infused over 30 minutes once weekly. The efficacy of dalbavancin (1000 mg on day 1 and 500 mg on day 8) has been examined in two randomized controlled trials in adults with cSSSIs. In each study, the primary efficacy measure was clinical success at the test-of-cure or follow-up visit in clinically evaluable patients. In a randomized, controlled, double-blind, multinational, phase III trial, dalbavancin was noninferior to linezolid, with clinical success rates of 88.9% and 91.2%. In a randomized, open-label, multicentre, phase II trial, clinical success rates were 94% with dalbavancin and 76% with comparator antibacterials. Dalbavancin was generally well tolerated by adult patients with cSSSIs, with most adverse events being of mild or moderate severity.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, BacterialHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSkin Diseases, BacterialTeicoplaninAnti-Bacterial AgentsdalbavancinTeicoplanin

Identifiers

PMID18370443
OpenAlexW3189298887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.