ArticleGenome research2008
Identification and analysis of ancestral hominoid transcriptome inferred from cross-species transcript and processed pseudogene comparisons.
Article in Genome research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Genomic Impact of Gene Retrocopies: What Have We Learned from Comparative Genomics, Population Genomics, and Transcriptomic Analyses?Genome biology and evolution · 2017Article
- The life history of retrocopies illuminates the evolution of new mammalian genes.Genome research · 2016Article
- Integrative transcriptome sequencing identifies trans-splicing events with important roles in human embryonic stem cell pluripotency.Genome research · 2014Article
- CNVVdb: a database of copy number variations across vertebrate genomes.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2009Article
- RNA-based gene duplication: mechanistic and evolutionary insights.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2009Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Comparative transcriptomics studies in hominoids are difficult because of lack of EST information in the great apes. Nevertheless, processed pseudogenes (PPGs), which are reverse-transcribed ancient transcripts present in the current genome, can be regarded as a virtual transcript resource that may compensate for the paucity of ESTs in non-human hominoids. Here we show that chimpanzee PPGs can be applied to identification of novel human exons/alternatively spliced variants (ASVs) and inference of the ancestral hominoid transcriptome and chimpanzee exon loss events. We develop a method for comparatively extracting novel transcripts from PPGs (designated "CENTP") and identify 643 novel human exons/ASVs. RT-PCR-sequencing experiments confirmed >50% of the tested exons/ASVs, supporting the effectiveness of the CENTP pipeline. With reference to the ancestral transcriptome inferred by CENTP, 47 chimpanzee exon loss events are identified. Furthermore, by combining out-group and PPG information, we identify 20 chimpanzee-specific exon loss and 10 human-specific exon gain events. We also demonstrate that the ancestral transcriptome and exon loss/gain events inferred based on comparisons of current transcripts may be incomplete (or occasionally inappropriate) because ancestral transcripts may not be represented in the ESTs of existing species. Finally, functional analysis reveals that the novel exons identified based on chimpanzee transcripts are significantly enriched in genes related to translation regulatory activity and viral life cycle, suggesting different expression levels of the associated transcripts, and thus divergent splicing isoform composition between human and chimpanzee in these functional categories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.