Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18368428›Full record

ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2008

Therapies for steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome.

Elisabeth M Hodson, Jonathan C Craig

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCommentEditorial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Chapter 4: Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children.Kidney international supplements · 2012
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Dose- and time-dependent glucocorticoid receptor signaling in podocytes.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2010
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elisabeth M Hodson
Jonathan C Craig
University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Between 10 and 20% of children with primary nephrotic syndrome are steroid-resistant (SRNS). From earlier studies in children with SRNS, we know that cyclosporin (with or without alternate-day prednisone) and cyclophosphamide (with pulse intravenous corticosteroids) result in comparable complete or partial remission rates of about 60%. An evaluation of the relative effectiveness of cyclophosphamide and cyclosporin has not been possible because of the absence of a head-to-head randomised trial. The Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Pädiatrische Nephrologie trial, published in this issue of Pediatric Nephrology, has filled this gap in our evidence base. Although there was no difference in the number of patients achieving complete remission, those patients receiving cyclosporin treatment were significantly more likely to achieve partial remission than those receiving intravenous cyclophosphamide. This result suggests that cyclosporin rather than cyclophosphamide should be used as first line therapy for children with SRNS.

Indexed as

Adrenal Cortex HormonesChildCyclophosphamideCyclosporineDrug ResistanceHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMembrane ProteinsMutationNephrotic SyndromeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdrenal Cortex HormonesCyclophosphamideCyclosporineImmunosuppressive AgentsIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMembrane ProteinsNPHS2 protein

Identifiers

PMID18368428
OpenAlexW2060207582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.