Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18368011›Full record

Trial reportJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2009

Community-based intervention to reduce pesticide exposure to farmworkers and potential take-home exposure to their families.

Asa Bradman, Alicia L Salvatore, Mark Boeniger, Rosemary Castorina, John Snyder, Dana B Barr, Nicholas P Jewell, Geri Kavanagh-Baird, Cynthia Striley, Brenda Eskenazi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Educational interventions for preventing lead poisoning in workers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Asa BradmanCenter for Children's Environmental Health Research, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-7380, USA. abradman@socrates.berkeley.edu
Alicia L Salvatore
Mark Boeniger
Rosemary Castorina
John Snyder
Dana B Barr
Nicholas P Jewell
Geri Kavanagh-Baird
Cynthia Striley
Brenda Eskenazi
Center for Children · USNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USClinica de Salud del Valle de Salinas · USUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

Project C: Epigenetic Effects of DDT/E and PBDEs on PubertyP01ES009605 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI ESKENAZI, BRENDA · 1999 to 2015
$11.2M
Reducing pesticide exposures to farmworker children.R01ES011352 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI ESKENAZI, BRENDA · 2001 to 2005
$1.6M
NIEHS NIH HHS P01 ES009605NIEHS NIH HHS P01ES009605NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES011352NIEHS NIH HHS R01ES11352
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The US EPA Worker Protection Standard requires pesticide safety training for farmworkers. Combined with re-entry intervals, these regulations are designed to reduce pesticide exposure. Little research has been conducted on whether additional steps may reduce farmworker exposure and the potential for take-home exposure to their families. We conducted an intervention with 44 strawberry harvesters (15 control and 29 intervention group members) to determine whether education, encouragement of handwashing, and the use of gloves and removable coveralls reduced exposure. Post-intervention, we collected foliage and urine samples, as well as hand rinse, lower-leg skin patch, and clothing patch samples. Post-intervention loading of malathion on hands was lower among workers who wore gloves compared to those who did not (median=8.2 vs. 777.2 microg per pair, respectively (P<0.001)); similarly, median MDA levels in urine were lower among workers who wore gloves (45.3 vs. 131.2 microg/g creatinine, P<0.05). Malathion was detected on clothing (median=0.13 microg/cm(2)), but not on skin. Workers who ate strawberries had higher malathion dicarboxylic acid levels in urine (median=114.5 vs. 39.4 microg/g creatinine, P<0.01). These findings suggest that wearing gloves reduces pesticide exposure to workers contacting strawberry foliage containing dislodgeable residues. Additionally, wearing gloves and removing work clothes before returning home could reduce transport of pesticides to worker homes. Behavioral interventions are needed to reduce consumption of strawberries in the field.

Indexed as

Family HealthHealth EducationOccupational HealthAgricultureAir Pollutants, OccupationalCommunity-Institutional RelationsFragariaHand DisinfectionHumansMalathionOccupational ExposurePesticidesProtective ClothingRisk FactorsAir Pollutants, OccupationalMalathionPesticides

Identifiers

PMID18368011
PMCPMC4545293
OpenAlexW2004641858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.