ArticleBMC genomics2008
Topological comparison of methods for predicting transcriptional cooperativity in yeast.
Article in BMC genomics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcription factors in the pathogenesis of pulmonary arterial hypertension-Current knowledge and therapeutic potential.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Genomic Analysis of Glioblastoma Multiforme Reveals a Key Transcription Factor Signature Relevant to Prognosis and the Immune Processes.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Combinatorial Cis-regulation in Saccharomyces Species.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2016Article
- Detecting Cooperativity between Transcription Factors Based on Functional Coherence and Similarity of Their Target Gene Sets.PloS one · 2016Article
- Properly defining the targets of a transcription factor significantly improves the computational identification of cooperative transcription factor pairs in yeast.BMC genomics · 2015Article
- Identifying transcription factor complexes and their roles.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2014Article
- A comprehensive performance evaluation on the prediction results of existing cooperative transcription factors identification algorithms.BMC systems biology · 2014Article
- Functional and topological characterization of transcriptional cooperativity in yeast.BMC research notes · 2012Article
- A novel unbiased measure for motif co-occurrence predicts combinatorial regulation of transcription.BMC genomics · 2012Article
- Inference of sparse combinatorial-control networks from gene-expression data: a message passing approach.BMC bioinformatics · 2010Article
- Biana: a software framework for compiling biological interactions and analyzing networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2010Article
- Predicting eukaryotic transcriptional cooperativity by Bayesian network integration of genome-wide data.Nucleic acids research · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe cooperative interaction between transcription factors has a decisive role in the control of the fate of the eukaryotic cell. Computational approaches for characterizing cooperative transcription factors in yeast, however, are based on different rationales and provide a low overlap between their results. Because the wealth of information contained in protein interaction networks and regulatory networks has proven highly effective in elucidating functional relationships between proteins, we compared different sets of cooperative transcription factor pairs (predicted by four different computational methods) within the frame of those networks.
resultsOur results show that the overlap between the sets of cooperative transcription factors predicted by the different methods is low yet significant. Cooperative transcription factors predicted by all methods are closer and more clustered in the protein interaction network than expected by chance. On the other hand, members of a cooperative transcription factor pair neither seemed to regulate each other nor shared similar regulatory inputs, although they do regulate similar groups of target genes.
conclusionDespite the different definitions of transcriptional cooperativity and the different computational approaches used to characterize cooperativity between transcription factors, the analysis of their roles in the framework of the protein interaction network and the regulatory network indicates a common denominator for the predictions under study. The knowledge of the shared topological properties of cooperative transcription factor pairs in both networks can be useful not only for designing better prediction methods but also for better understanding the complexities of transcriptional control in eukaryotes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.