Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18366687›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2008

Handheld computers for self-administered sensitive data collection: a comparative study in Peru.

Antonio Bernabe-Ortiz, Walter H Curioso, Marco A Gonzales, Wilfredo Evangelista, Jesus M Castagnetto, Cesar P Carcamo, James P Hughes, Patricia J Garcia, Geoffrey P Garnett, King K Holmes

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Health Worker mHealth Utilization: A Systematic Review.Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Development of a Digital Case Management Tool for Community Based Inclusive Development Program.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Antonio Bernabe-OrtizSchool of Public Health and Administration, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru. 03887@upch.edu.pe
Walter H Curioso
Marco A Gonzales
Wilfredo Evangelista
Jesus M Castagnetto
Cesar P Carcamo
James P Hughes
Patricia J Garcia
Geoffrey P Garnett
King K Holmes

Funding

University of Washington/Fred Hutch Center for AIDS ResearchP30AI027757 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Kenneth Sherr · 1988 to 2026
$104.9M
INTERNATIONAL TRAINING GRANT IN EPIDEMIOLOGYD43TW000007 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FARQUHAR, CAREY · 1988 to 2012
$16.3M
Research Development and TrainingU19AI053218 · NIAID · ASOCIACION CIVIL IMPACTA SALUD Y EDUCACN · PI GARCIA, PATRICIA JANNET · 2004 to 2006
$3.0M
A Global Health Demonstration Program in PeruR25TW007490 · FIC · UNIVERSIDAD PERUANA CAYETANO HEREDIA · PI GARCIA, PATRICIA JANNET · 2005 to 2007
$383k
FIC NIH HHS 5R25TW007490FIC NIH HHS D43 TW000007FIC NIH HHS D43-TW00007FIC NIH HHS R25 TW007490NIAID NIH HHS 5U19AI053218NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027757NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI053218Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 059131/Z/99/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow-cost handheld computers (PDA) potentially represent an efficient tool for collecting sensitive data in surveys. The goal of this study is to evaluate the quality of sexual behavior data collected with handheld computers in comparison with paper-based questionnaires.

methodsA PDA-based program for data collection was developed using Open-Source tools. In two cross-sectional studies, we compared data concerning sexual behavior collected with paper forms to data collected with PDA-based forms in Ancon (Lima).

resultsThe first study enrolled 200 participants (18-29 years). General agreement between data collected with paper format and handheld computers was 86%. Categorical variables agreement was between 70.5% and 98.5% (Kappa: 0.43-0.86) while numeric variables agreement was between 57.1% and 79.8% (Spearman: 0.76-0.95). Agreement and correlation were higher in those who had completed at least high school than those with less education. The second study enrolled 198 participants. Rates of responses to sensitive questions were similar between both kinds of questionnaires. However, the number of inconsistencies (p = 0.0001) and missing values (p = 0.001) were significantly higher in paper questionnaires.

conclusionThis study showed the value of the use of handheld computers for collecting sensitive data, since a high level of agreement between paper and PDA responses was reached. In addition, a lower number of inconsistencies and missing values were found with the PDA-based system. This study has demonstrated that it is feasible to develop a low-cost application for handheld computers, and that PDAs are feasible alternatives for collecting field data in a developing country.

Indexed as

Computers, HandheldAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesData CollectionData DisplayFemaleForms and Records ControlHumansMaleMedical RecordsMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedPeruSoftwareSurveys and QuestionnairesUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID18366687
PMCPMC2323371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.