Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18366653›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2008

Experimental evolution and genome sequencing reveal variation in levels of clonal interference in large populations of bacteriophage phiX174.

Kim M Pepin, Holly A Wichman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Genome dynamics during experimental evolution.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2013
    Review
  15. Distribution of fixed beneficial mutations and the rate of adaptation in asexual populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Why do RNA viruses recombine?Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2011
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Experimental evolution of viruses: Microviridae as a model system.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kim M PepinDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, 83844-3051, USA. kmp29@psu.edu
Holly A Wichman
University of Idaho · US

Funding

The Evolution of Protein FlexibilityP20RR016448 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO · PI FORNEY, LARRY J · 2002 to 2011
$19.3M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR16448
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn large asexual populations where beneficial mutations may co-occur and recombination is absent, the fate of beneficial mutations can be significantly affected by competition (i.e., clonal interference). Theoretical models predict that clonal interference (CI) can slow adaptation, alter the distribution of fixed beneficial mutations, and affect disease progression by impacting within-host evolution of pathogens. While phenotypic data support that CI is a significant determinant of adaptive outcome, genetic data are needed to verify the patterns and to inform evolutionary models. We adapted replicate populations of the bacteriophage phiX174 under two levels of CaCl2 to create benign and harsh environments. Genomic sequences of multiple individuals from evolved populations were used to detect competing beneficial mutations.

resultsThere were several competing genotypes in most of the populations where CaCl2 was abundant, but no evidence of CI where CaCl2 was scarce, even though rates of adaptation and population sizes among the treatments were similar. The sequence data revealed that observed mutations were limited to a single portion of one gene in the harsh treatment, but spanned a different and larger region of the genome under the benign treatments, suggesting that there were more adaptive solutions to the benign treatment.

conclusionBeneficial mutations with relatively large selection coefficients can be excluded by CI. CI may commonly determine the fate of beneficial mutations in large microbial populations, but its occurrence depends on selective conditions. CI was more frequent in benign selective conditions possibly due to a greater number of adaptive targets under this treatment. Additionally, the genomic sequence data showed that selection can target different types and numbers of phenotypes in environments that differ by only a single continuous variable.

Indexed as

Adaptation, BiologicalEvolution, MolecularGenome, ViralMutationBacteriophage phi X 174Calcium ChlorideDNA, ViralSelection, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNAVirus CultivationCalcium ChlorideDNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID18366653
PMCPMC2292699
OpenAlexW1993418368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.