SynthesisBMC medicine2008
More in hope than expectation: a systematic review of women's expectations and experience of pain relief in labour.
Synthesis in BMC medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
71 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 268 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacological pain relief and women´s birth experience: a systematic review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Pooled it
- The effects of dance on maternal childbirth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Pooled it
- Key dimensions of women's and their partners' experiences of childbirth: A systematic review of reviews of qualitative studies.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Effect of a decision aid on the choice of pregnant women whether to have epidural anesthesia or not during labor.PloS one · 2020Trial
- Associations between maternal characteristics and women's responses to acupuncture during labour: a secondary analysis from a randomised controlled trial.Acupuncture in medicine : journal of the British Medical Acupuncture Society · 2017Trial
- Unexpected consequences: women's experiences of a self-hypnosis intervention to help with pain relief during labour.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2015Trial
- Self-hypnosis for intrapartum pain management in pregnant nulliparous women: a randomised controlled trial of clinical effectiveness.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2015Trial
- Effect of dance labor on the management of active phase labor pain & clients' satisfaction: a randomized controlled trial study.Global journal of health science · 2014Trial
- Antenatal education and the birthing experience of Brazilian women: a qualitative study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2013Trial
- Assisting informed decision making for labour analgesia: a randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for labour analgesia versus a pamphlet.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2010Trial
- Personality-Related Characteristics, Cultural Beliefs, and Labor Pain Perception After the 2023 Türkiye Earthquakes: A Prospective Study in Hatay.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Low-dose epidural morphine for postpartum pain relief: a randomized, single-blind study.JA clinical reports · 2025Article
- Women's perspectives of decision-making for labour and birth: a qualitative antenatal-postnatal paired interview study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Review
- Parturients' perspectives on labor pain and epidural analgesia: A protocol for an explorative qualitative study.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
- The effectiveness of decision-making support methods during pregnancy regarding epidural analgesia in labor: A scoping review.European journal of midwifery · 2025Article
- The association between emotion regulation and pain during the immediate postpartum period.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Article
- The Farver-Campos Labor Coping Scale as a Replacement for the 10-Point Pain Scale for Labor.The Journal of perinatal education · 2024Article
- Informing about childbirth without increasing anxiety: a qualitative study of first-time pregnant women and partners' perceptions and needs.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChildbirth is one of the most painful events that a woman is likely to experience, the multi-dimensional aspect and intensity of which far exceeds disease conditions. A woman's lack of knowledge about the risks and benefits of the various methods of pain relief can heighten anxiety. Women are increasingly expected, and are expecting, to participate in decisions about their healthcare. Involvement should allow women to make better-informed decisions; the National Institute for Clinical Excellence has stated that we need effective ways of supporting pregnant women in making informed decisions during labour. Our aim was to systematically review the empirical literature on women's expectations and experiences of pain and pain relief during labour, as well as their involvement in the decision-making process.
methodsA systematic review was conducted using the following databases: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Bath Information and Database Service (BIDS), Excerpta Medica Database Guide (EMBASE), Midwives Information and Resource (MIDIRS), Sociological Abstracts and PsychINFO. Studies that examined experience and expectations of pain, and its relief in labour, were appraised and the findings were integrated into a systematic review.
resultsAppraisal revealed four key themes: the level and type of pain, pain relief, involvement in decision-making and control. Studies predominantly showed that women underestimated the pain they would experience. Women may hope for a labour free of pain relief, but many found that they needed or benefited from it. There is a distinction between women's desire for a drug-free labour and the expectation that they may need some sort of pain relief. Inaccurate or unrealistic expectations about pain may mean that women are not prepared appropriately for labour. Many women acknowledged that they wanted to participate in decision-making, but the degree of involvement varied. Women expected to take control in labour in a number of ways, but their degree of reported control was less than hoped for.
conclusionWomen may have ideal hopes of what they would like to happen with respect to pain relief, control and engagement in decision-making, but experience is often very different from expectations. Antenatal educators need to ensure that pregnant women are appropriately prepared for what might actually happen to limit this expectation-experience gap and potentially support greater satisfaction with labour.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.