Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18366601›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2008

An integrative approach to characterize disease-specific pathways and their coordination: a case study in cancer.

Min Xu, Ming-Chih J Kao, Juan Nunez-Iglesias, Joseph R Nevins, Mike West, Xianghong Jasmine Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Algorithm to identify frequent coupled modules from two-layered network series: application to study transcription and splicing coupling.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2012
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Min XuProgram in Molecular and Computational Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. mxu@usc.edu
Ming-Chih J Kao
Juan Nunez-Iglesias
Joseph R Nevins
Mike West
Xianghong Jasmine Zhou
University of Southern California · USDecision Sciences (United States) · USDuke University · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Integration of Oncogenic Networks in Cancer PhenotypesU54CA112952 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI NEVINS, JOSEPH R · 2004 to 2009
$12.4M
Integrative Analysis of Cross-Platform Microarray DataR01GM074163 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI ZHOU, XIANGHONG JASMINE · 2006 to 2010
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA112952NCI NIH HHS U54CA112952NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074163NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM074163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe most common application of microarray technology in disease research is to identify genes differentially expressed in disease versus normal tissues. However, it is known that, in complex diseases, phenotypes are determined not only by genes, but also by the underlying structure of genetic networks. Often, it is the interaction of many genes that causes phenotypic variations.

resultsIn this work, using cancer as an example, we develop graph-based methods to integrate multiple microarray datasets to discover disease-related co-expression network modules. We propose an unsupervised method that take into account both co-expression dynamics and network topological information to simultaneously infer network modules and phenotype conditions in which they are activated or de-activated. Using our method, we have discovered network modules specific to cancer or subtypes of cancers. Many of these modules are consistent with or supported by their functional annotations or their previously known involvement in cancer. In particular, we identified a module that is predominately activated in breast cancer and is involved in tumor suppression. While individual components of this module have been suggested to be associated with tumor suppression, their coordinated function has never been elucidated. Here by adopting a network perspective, we have identified their interrelationships and, particularly, a hub gene PDGFRL that may play an important role in this tumor suppressor network.

conclusionUsing a network-based approach, our method provides new insights into the complex cellular mechanisms that characterize cancer and cancer subtypes. By incorporating co-expression dynamics information, our approach can not only extract more functionally homogeneous modules than those based solely on network topology, but also reveal pathway coordination beyond co-expression.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksHumansOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisReceptors, Platelet-Derived Growth FactorSignal TransductionTranscription FactorsReceptors, Platelet-Derived Growth FactorTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID18366601
PMCPMC2386054
OpenAlexW1981765976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.