ArticleMolecular biotechnology2008
In vitro direct repeats-mediated deletion during PCR amplification.
Article in Molecular biotechnology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While conducting our research on mutations in the human blood platelet glycoprotein Ib-alpha (GPIbalpha) gene, we detected an unusual deletion of 84 bp. This deletion took place in vitro, during PCR and between two direct repeats. It was observed that the deletion could be detected either by the direct sequencing of the PCR product or after the latter's cloning into a plasmid. After observing a series of four sequenced clones from the same individual, we noticed that while three had the same 84-bp deletion, the fourth exhibited a shorter one. We also noted that there were no cases wherein both deleted and undeleted amplicons coexisted and that several point mutations occurred in the sequence surrounding the deletion. Such Taq errors are statistically more frequent in the "deletion prone DNA" than usual. Interestingly, the deletion was observed only in a DNA, which we call here "deletion prone DNA", whose structure might have been particularly reorganized. Indeed, the mung bean nuclease pre-treatment of this DNA prior to PCR prevented the deletion, thus strengthening the hypothesis that an intra-strand hairpin structure was involved in the deletion process. Direct repeats-mediated deletion is well known in vivo but this is the first report of such "in vitro direct repeats deletion".
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.