Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18365169›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2008

Monitoring of intracranial pressure in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: an Austrian prospective multicenter study.

Walter Mauritz, Heinz Steltzer, Peter Bauer, Lorenz Dolanski-Aghamanoukjan, Philipp Metnitz

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impacts of intracranial pressure monitoring on mortality and length of stay in severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Impact of concomitant injuries on outcomes after traumatic brain injury.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2013
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Critical care management of severe traumatic brain injury in adults.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Walter MauritzDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Trauma Hospital Lorenz Boehler, Donaueschingenstrasse 13, 1200, Vienna, Austria. walter.mauritz@auva.at
Heinz Steltzer
Peter Bauer
Lorenz Dolanski-Aghamanoukjan
Philipp Metnitz
Medical University of Vienna · ATLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology · ATUnfallkrankenhaus Meidling · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe goals of this study were to elucidate reasons why patients did or did not receive intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring and to describe factors influencing hospital mortality after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).

designProspective multicenter cohort study. PATIENTS AND

participants88,274 patients consecutively admitted to 32 medical, surgical and mixed Austrian ICUs between 1998 and 2004.

interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS AND

results1,856 patients (2.1% of all ICU admissions) exhibited severe TBI (GCS < 9); of these, 1,031 (56%) had ICP monitoring. The "worst" and the "best" cases were both less likely to receive ICP monitoring. Younger patients, female patients, and patients with isolated TBI were more likely to receive ICP monitoring. Compared with large centers ICP was monitored more frequently [odds ratio (OR) 3.09, CI 2.42-3.94] in medium-sized centers. The 20% of patients with the highest likelihood to receive ICP monitoring were monitored in 91% of cases, and had the lowest hospital mortality (31%, OR 0.78, CI 0.37-1.64). Multivariate analysis revealed that severity of illness, TBI severity, isolated TBI, and the number of cases treated per year were associated with hospital outcome. Compared with the large centers, ORs for hospital mortality were 1.85 (CI 1.42-2.40) for patients from medium-sized centers and 1.91 (CI 1.24-2.93) for patients from small centers.

conclusionsICP monitoring may possibly have some beneficial effects, but this needs further evaluation. Patients with severe TBI should be admitted to experienced centers with high patient volumes since this might improve hospital mortality rates.

Indexed as

Hospital MortalityIntracranial PressureAdultAgedAPACHEAustriaBrain InjuriesFemaleGlasgow Coma ScaleHumansInjury Severity ScoreIntensive Care UnitsLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, Physiologic

Identifiers

PMID18365169
OpenAlexW2075256030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.