ArticlePloS one2008
Probabilistic inference of transcription factor binding from multiple data sources.
Article in PloS one, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Benefiting from the intrinsic role of epigenetics to predict patterns of CTCF binding.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- Dempster-Shafer Theory for the Prediction of Auxin-Response Elements (AuxREs) in Plant Genomes.BioMed research international · 2018Article
- Methodology for single nucleotide polymorphism selection in promoter regions for clinical use. An example of its applicability.International journal of molecular epidemiology and genetics · 2016Article
- An Overview of NCA-Based Algorithms for Transcriptional Regulatory Network Inference.Microarrays (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015Review
- A DNA shape-based regulatory score improves position-weight matrix-based recognition of transcription factor binding sites.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2015Article
- Compound hierarchical correlated beta mixture with an application to cluster mouse transcription factor DNA binding data.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2015Article
- An Empirical Prior Improves Accuracy for Bayesian Estimation of Transcription Factor Binding Site Frequencies within Gene Promoters.Bioinformatics and biology insights · 2015Article
- Integrating diverse datasets improves developmental enhancer prediction.PLoS computational biology · 2014Article
- Article
- Article
- MotifLab: a tools and data integration workbench for motif discovery and regulatory sequence analysis.BMC bioinformatics · 2013Article
- Inferring functional transcription factor-gene binding pairs by integrating transcription factor binding data with transcription factor knockout data.BMC systems biology · 2013Article
- Article
- Epigenetic priors for identifying active transcription factor binding sites.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2012Article
- Increasing coverage of transcription factor position weight matrices through domain-level homology.PloS one · 2012Article
- Cancer systems biology: signal processing for cancer research.Chinese journal of cancer · 2011Article
- A linear model for transcription factor binding affinity prediction in protein binding microarrays.PloS one · 2011Article
- The role of chromatin accessibility in directing the widespread, overlapping patterns of Drosophila transcription factor binding.Genome biology · 2011Article
- A Bayesian search for transcriptional motifs.PloS one · 2010Article
- PriorsEditor: a tool for the creation and use of positional priors in motif discovery.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An important problem in molecular biology is to build a complete understanding of transcriptional regulatory processes in the cell. We have developed a flexible, probabilistic framework to predict TF binding from multiple data sources that differs from the standard hypothesis testing (scanning) methods in several ways. Our probabilistic modeling framework estimates the probability of binding and, thus, naturally reflects our degree of belief in binding. Probabilistic modeling also allows for easy and systematic integration of our binding predictions into other probabilistic modeling methods, such as expression-based gene network inference. The method answers the question of whether the whole analyzed promoter has a binding site, but can also be extended to estimate the binding probability at each nucleotide position. Further, we introduce an extension to model combinatorial regulation by several TFs. Most importantly, the proposed methods can make principled probabilistic inference from multiple evidence sources, such as, multiple statistical models (motifs) of the TFs, evolutionary conservation, regulatory potential, CpG islands, nucleosome positioning, DNase hypersensitive sites, ChIP-chip binding segments and other (prior) sequence-based biological knowledge. We developed both a likelihood and a Bayesian method, where the latter is implemented with a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm. Results on a carefully constructed test set from the mouse genome demonstrate that principled data fusion can significantly improve the performance of TF binding prediction methods. We also applied the probabilistic modeling framework to all promoters in the mouse genome and the results indicate a sparse connectivity between transcriptional regulators and their target promoters. To facilitate analysis of other sequences and additional data, we have developed an on-line web tool, ProbTF, which implements our probabilistic TF binding prediction method using multiple data sources. Test data set, a web tool, source codes and supplementary data are available at: http://www.probtf.org.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.