Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18364003›Full record

ReviewImmunological reviews2008

Signaling defects in anti-tumor T cells.

Alan B Frey, Ngozi Monu

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunological reviews, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Shaping of NK cell responses by the tumor microenvironment.Cancer microenvironment : official journal of the International Cancer Microenvironment Society · 2013
    Article
  19. [Immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer--novel approaches to improve patient outcome].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2013
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alan B FreyDepartment of Cell Biology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA. freya01@med.nyu.edu
Ngozi Monu
New York University · US

Funding

Tumor-Induced Defective CTL Lytic FunctionR01CA108573 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI FREY, ALAN B · 2006 to 2010
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS CA108573NCI NIH HHS R01 CA108573
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The immune response to cancer has been long recognized, including both innate and adaptive responses, showing that the immune system can recognize protein products of genetic and epigenetic changes in transformed cells. The accumulation of antigen-specific T cells within the tumor, the draining lymph node, and the circulation, either in newly diagnosed patients or resultant from experimental immunotherapy, proves that tumors produce antigens and that priming occurs. Unfortunately, just as obviously, tumors grow, implying that anti-tumor immune responses are either not sufficiently vigorous to eliminate the cancer or that anti-tumor immunity is suppressed. Both possibilities are supported by current data. In experimental animal models of cancer and also in patients, systemic immunity is usually not dramatically suppressed, because tumor-bearing animals and patients develop T-cell-dependent immune responses to microbes and to either model antigens or experimental cancer vaccines. However, inhibition of specific anti-tumor immunity is common, and several possible explanations of tolerance to tumor antigens or tumor-induced immunesuppression have been proposed. Inhibition of effective anti-tumor immunity results from the tumor or the host response to tumor growth, inhibiting the activation, differentiation, or function of anti-tumor immune cells. As a consequence, anti-tumor T cells cannot respond productively to developmental, targeting, or activation cues. While able to enhance the number and phenotype of anti-tumor T cells, the modest success of immunotherapy has shown the necessity to attempt to reverse tolerance in anti-tumor T cells, and the vanguard of experimental therapy now focuses on vaccination in combination with blockade of immunosuppressive mechanisms. This review discusses several potential mechanisms by which anti-tumor T cells may be inhibited in function.

Indexed as

Lymphocyte ActivationTumor EscapeAnimalsAntigen PresentationAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesCD3 ComplexCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCytotoxicity, ImmunologicEpitopesHumansImmune ToleranceImmunotherapyLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingMiceMyeloid CellsAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesCD3 antigen, zeta chainCD3 ComplexEpitopes

Identifiers

PMID18364003
PMCPMC3731145
OpenAlexW1980484335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.