Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18362029›Full record

ArticleHeart rhythm2008

Atria are more susceptible to electroporation than ventricles: implications for atrial stunning, shock-induced arrhythmia and defibrillation failure.

Vadim V Fedorov, Geran Kostecki, Matt Hemphill, Igor R Efimov

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heart rhythm, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. HumanFrontiers in physiology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Optical mapping of the isolated coronary-perfused human sinus node.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2010
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Differential K(ATP) channel pharmacology in intact mouse heart.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2010
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vadim V FedorovDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130-4899. USA.
Geran Kostecki
Matt Hemphill
Igor R Efimov
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

The role of electroporation in defibrillationR01HL074283 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EFIMOV, IGOR R · 2004 to 2007
$2.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL074283NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL074283
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDefibrillation shock is known to induce atrial stunning, which is electrical and mechanical dysfunction.

objectiveWe hypothesized that atrial stunning is caused by higher atrial susceptibility to electroporation vs ventricles. We also hypothesize that electroporation may be responsible for early recurrence of atrial fibrillation.

methodsWe investigated electroporation induced by 10-ms epicardial high-intensity shocks applied locally in atria and ventricles of Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts (n = 12) using optical mapping.

resultsElectroporation was centered at the electrode and was evident from transient diastolic depolarization and reduction of action potential amplitude and maximum upstroke derivative. Electroporation was voltage-dependent and polarity-dependent and was significantly more pronounced in the atria vs ventricles (P <.01), with a summary 50% of Effective Dose (ED50) for main measured parameters of 9.2 +/- 3.6 V/cm and 13.6 +/- 3.2 V/cm in the atria vs 37.4 +/- 1.5 V/cm and 48.4 +/- 2.8 V/cm in the ventricles, for anodal and cathodal stimuli, respectively. In atria (n = 5), shocks of both polarities (27.2 +/- 1.1 V/cm) transiently induced conduction block and reentry around the inexcitable area. Electroporation-induced ectopic activity was a possible trigger for reentry. However, in the thicker ventricles, electroporation and resulting conduction slowing and block were restricted to the surface only, preventing complete block and arrhythmia. The upstroke morphology revealed that the wave front dived below the electroporated region and resurfaced into unaffected epicardial tissue.

conclusionWe showed that the atria are more vulnerable to electroporation and resulting block and arrhythmia than the ventricles.

Indexed as

ElectroporationAction PotentialsAnimalsAtrial FibrillationDiastoleElectric CountershockElectrodesHeart AtriaHeart VentriclesModels, AnimalPericardiumRabbitsRecurrenceRisk FactorsTachycardia, VentricularTreatment Failure

Identifiers

PMID18362029
PMCPMC2365756
OpenAlexW2011554366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.