Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18360732›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2008

An examination of the impact of "the Maudsley eating disorder collaborative care skills workshops" on the well being of carers: a pilot study.

Ana Rosa Sepulveda, C Lopez, G Todd, W Whitaker, J Treasure

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The current clinical approach to feeding and eating disorders aimed to increase personalization of management.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ana Rosa SepulvedaPsychological Medicine Dept., King's College of London, Institute of Psychiatry, Guys Hospital, 5th Floor Thomas Guy House, London, SE1 9RT, UK. a.sepulveda@iop.kcl.ac.uk
C Lopez
G Todd
W Whitaker
J Treasure

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCarers of people with eating disorders experience high levels of distress due to the difficulties in their care giving role and their perceived lack of resources to help their relative. This paper describes an intervention where some of the skills used by specialist nurses and other staff from an eating disorder intensive care setting are taught to carers to improve their sense of competency and alleviate their distress. The aim of this study was to examine the feasibility and acceptability of "the Maudsley eating disorder collaborative care skills workshops" programme among care givers and whether the difficulties and distress involved in caring for a person with an eating disorder were reduced.

methodsThirty-five carers from 30 families were invited to participate in this programme, which consisted of a total of six workshops, delivered in 2-h sessions over 3 months. Assessments were undertaken at baseline (T0), at the end of the workshops (T1) and 3 months later (T2).

resultsThe level of carer distress (GHQ) fell significantly after the intervention. The level of general care giving burden (ECI) also reduced as did the specific difficulties caused by eating disorder symptoms (EDSIS). These changes were maintained over time (T2).

conclusionsThe transfer of specialist skills within the programme was highly valued by the carers and lessened their stress and care giving difficulties.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorProgram EvaluationAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultAgedAttitude to HealthCaregiversCognitive Behavioral TherapyEducationExpressed EmotionFamily HealthFeasibility StudiesFeeding and Eating DisordersFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.