Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18359521›Full record

ArticleBehavioural brain research2008

A new test paradigm for social recognition evidenced by urinary scent marking behavior in C57BL/6J mice.

Hiroyuki Arakawa, Keiko Arakawa, D Caroline Blanchard, Robert J Blanchard

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural brain research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Behavioral Assays in the Study of Olfaction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Neuromodulatory roles ofAIMS neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. GABABrain communications · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroyuki ArakawaPacific Biosciences Research Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa, HI, USA. harakawa@binghamton.edu
Keiko Arakawa
D Caroline Blanchard
Robert J Blanchard
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · USUniversity of Hawaii System · US

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII SNRPU54NS039406 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI NICHOLS, ROBERT · 1999 to 2009
$14.4M
The Genetic Control of Social Behavior in the MouseR01MH081845 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI BLANCHARD, DIXIE CAROLINE · 2009 to 2012
$1.6M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH081845NINDS NIH HHS U54 NS039406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Olfaction is a major sensory element in intraspecies recognition and communication in mice. The present study investigated scent marking behaviors of males of the highly inbred C57BL/6J (C57) strain in order to evaluate the ability of these behaviors to provide clear and consistent measures of social familiarity and response to social signals. C57 males engage in scent marking when placed in a chamber with a wire mesh partition separating them from a conspecific. Male mice (C57 or outbred CD-1 mice) showed rapid habituation of scent marking (decreased marking over trials) with repeated exposure at 24-h intervals, to a stimulus animal of the C57 or CD-1 strains, or to an empty chamber. Subsequent exposure to a genetically different novel mouse (CD-1 after CD-1 exposure, or CD-1 after C57 exposure) or to a novel context (different shaped chamber) produced recovery of marking, while responses to a novel but genetically identical mouse (C57 after C57 exposure) or to the empty chamber did not. This finding demonstrated that male mice differentiate familiar and novel conspecifics as expressed by habituation and recovery of scent marking, but neither C57 or CD-1 mice can differentiate new vs. familiar C57 males; likely due to similarities in their odor patterns. The data also indicate that scent marking can differentiate novel from familiar contexts.

Indexed as

Social BehaviorTerritorialityAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsBehavior, AnimalHabituation, PsychophysiologicMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPheromonesRecognition, PsychologyUrinePheromones

Identifiers

PMID18359521
PMCPMC2441767
OpenAlexW2069667743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.