Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18358518›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroendocrinology2008

Epigenetics and its implications for behavioral neuroendocrinology.

David Crews

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroendocrinology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Sex, love and oxytocin: Two metaphors and a molecule.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2022
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Epigenetic Inheritance: Concepts, Mechanisms and Perspectives.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  11. DNA methylation in spermatogenesis and male infertility.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Nature, nurture and epigenetics.Molecular and cellular endocrinology · 2014
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Epigenetics in comparative biology: why we should pay attention.Integrative and comparative biology · 2014
    Review
  20. Early growth trajectories affect sexual responsiveness.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

David CrewsSection of Integrative Biology and Center of Behavioral Neuroendocrinology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA. crews@mail.utexas.edu

Funding

EVOLUTION OF BRAIN/BEHAVIOR CONTROLLING MECHANISMSR01MH041770 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI CREWS, DAVID P · 1986 to 2009
$2.6M
ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCES ON BRAIN PLASTICITYR01MH057874 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI CREWS, DAVID P · 1998 to 2002
$535k
Epigenetic Influences on Brain and BehaviorR21MH068273 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI CREWS, DAVID P · 2003 to 2004
$259k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH041770NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH057874NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH41770NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH068273
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals vary in their sociosexual behaviors and reactivity. How the organism interacts with the environment to produce this variation has been a focus in psychology since its inception as a scientific discipline. There is now no question that cumulative experiences throughout life history interact with genetic predispositions to shape the individual's behavior. Recent evidence suggests that events in past generations may also influence how an individual responds to events in their own life history. Epigenetics is the study of how the environment can affect the genome of the individual during its development as well as the development of its descendants, all without changing the DNA sequence. Several distinctions must be made if this research is to become a staple in behavioral neuroendocrinology. The first distinction concerns perspective, and the need to distinguish and appreciate, the differences between Molecular versus Molar epigenetics. Each has its own lineage of investigation, yet both appear to be unaware of one another. Second, it is important to distinguish the difference between Context-Dependent versus Germline-Dependent epigenetic modifications. In essence the difference is one of the mechanism of heritability or transmission within, as apposed to across, generations. This review illustrates these distinctions while describing several rodent models that have shown particular promise for unraveling the contribution of genetics and the environment on sociosexual behavior. The first focuses on genetically-modified mice and makes the point that the early litter environment alters subsequent brain activity and behavior. This work emphasizes the need to understand behavioral development when doing research with such animals. The second focuses on a new rat model in which the epigenome is permanently imprinted, an effect that crosses generations to impact the descendants without further exposure to the precipitating agent. This work raises the question of how events in generations past can have consequences at both the mechanistic, behavioral, and ultimately evolutionary levels.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticNeuroendocrinologyAnimalsBehaviorBehavior, AnimalBiological EvolutionEndocrine DisruptorsEnvironmentGenotypeEndocrine Disruptors

Identifiers

PMID18358518
PMCPMC2394853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.