ReviewFrontiers in neuroendocrinology2008
Epigenetics and its implications for behavioral neuroendocrinology.
Review in Frontiers in neuroendocrinology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed.
- A test of the social behavior network reveals differential patterns of neural responses to social novelty in bonded, but not non-bonded, male prairie voles.Hormones and behavior · 2023Article
- Sex, love and oxytocin: Two metaphors and a molecule.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2022Review
- Behavioral, Neural, and Molecular Mechanisms of Conditioned Mate Preference: The Role of Opioids and First Experiences of Sexual Reward.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Prenatal maternal stress and offspring aggressive behavior: Intergenerational and transgenerational inheritance.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2022Review
- Neurobiological Implications of Parent-Child Emotional Availability: A Review.Brain sciences · 2021Review
- One cranium, two brains not yet introduced: Distinct but complementary views of the social brain.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2020Review
- Building an Asymmetrical Brain: The Molecular Perspective.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Review
- Analyzing the Effects of Intrauterine Hypoxia on Gene Expression in Oocytes of Rat Offspring by Single Cell Transcriptome Sequencing.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Gestational Hypoxia and Developmental Plasticity.Physiological reviews · 2018Review
- Epigenetic Inheritance: Concepts, Mechanisms and Perspectives.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2018Article
- DNA methylation in spermatogenesis and male infertility.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2016Article
- Single housing during early adolescence causes time-, area- and peptide-specific alterations in endogenous opioids of rat brain.British journal of pharmacology · 2015Article
- Perspectives on stress resilience and adolescent neurobehavioral function.Neurobiology of stress · 2015Review
- Hazards inherent in interdisciplinary behavioral research.Frontiers in zoology · 2015Review
- Implications of prenatal steroid perturbations for neurodevelopment, behavior, and autism.Endocrine reviews · 2014Review
- Nature, nurture and epigenetics.Molecular and cellular endocrinology · 2014Review
- Sexually dimorphic effects of ancestral exposure to vinclozolin on stress reactivity in rats.Endocrinology · 2014Article
- Minireview: transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: focus on endocrine disrupting compounds.Endocrinology · 2014Review
- Epigenetics in comparative biology: why we should pay attention.Integrative and comparative biology · 2014Review
- Early growth trajectories affect sexual responsiveness.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Individuals vary in their sociosexual behaviors and reactivity. How the organism interacts with the environment to produce this variation has been a focus in psychology since its inception as a scientific discipline. There is now no question that cumulative experiences throughout life history interact with genetic predispositions to shape the individual's behavior. Recent evidence suggests that events in past generations may also influence how an individual responds to events in their own life history. Epigenetics is the study of how the environment can affect the genome of the individual during its development as well as the development of its descendants, all without changing the DNA sequence. Several distinctions must be made if this research is to become a staple in behavioral neuroendocrinology. The first distinction concerns perspective, and the need to distinguish and appreciate, the differences between Molecular versus Molar epigenetics. Each has its own lineage of investigation, yet both appear to be unaware of one another. Second, it is important to distinguish the difference between Context-Dependent versus Germline-Dependent epigenetic modifications. In essence the difference is one of the mechanism of heritability or transmission within, as apposed to across, generations. This review illustrates these distinctions while describing several rodent models that have shown particular promise for unraveling the contribution of genetics and the environment on sociosexual behavior. The first focuses on genetically-modified mice and makes the point that the early litter environment alters subsequent brain activity and behavior. This work emphasizes the need to understand behavioral development when doing research with such animals. The second focuses on a new rat model in which the epigenome is permanently imprinted, an effect that crosses generations to impact the descendants without further exposure to the precipitating agent. This work raises the question of how events in generations past can have consequences at both the mechanistic, behavioral, and ultimately evolutionary levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.