Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18357567›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical materials research. Part A2009

Phenotypic non-equivalence of murine (monocyte-) macrophage cells in biomaterial and inflammatory models.

Lisa M Chamberlain, Marisha L Godek, Mercedes Gonzalez-Juarrero, David W Grainger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Engineered immunological niche directs therapeutic development in models of progressive multiple sclerosis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lisa M ChamberlainCell and Molecular Biology Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA.
Marisha L Godek
Mercedes Gonzalez-Juarrero
David W Grainger

Funding

Molecular Comparison of Macrophage Foreign Body ResponseR01EB000894 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI GRAINGER, DAVID W · 2004 to 2007
$1.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS EB000894NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB000894
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cells of the mononuclear phagocytic system including monocytes and macrophages (e.g., pooled human monocytes, bone marrow-derived macrophages, etc.) are often employed for in vitro assessment of novel biomaterials and to assay anti-inflammatory drug activity. In this context, numerous macrophage cells are treated interchangeably in the literature despite a lack of demonstrated equivalence among immortalized cell lines and further, between cell lines and primary-derived macrophages of different species. Three murine (monocyte-) macrophage cell lines (IC-21, J774A.1, and RAW 264.7), commonly utilizedin biomaterial and pharmaceutical screening research, have been compared with primary-derived murine bone marrow macrophages. Significant differences were discovered in the expression of cell surface proteins requisite for cell adhesion and activation among cell lines and primary-derived cells as well as between the different cell lines. Results demonstrate activation but with reduced cytokine expression to chemical stimulus (lipopolysaccharide) by cell lines compared with that of primary-derived macrophages. Limited correlation between cultured primary and immortalized cells in cytokine production, phenotype and intrinsic activation states has relevance to fidelity for in vitro testing. These differences warrant justification for selection of various cell lines for specific assay purposes, and merit caution if comparisons to primary cell types (i.e., for biocompatibility) are required.

Indexed as

Cells, CulturedModels, BiologicalAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBiomarkersBone Marrow CellsCell Culture TechniquesCell DifferentiationCytokinesFemaleHumansLipopolysaccharidesMacrophagesMaterials TestingMiceMice, Inbred C57BLBiocompatible MaterialsBiomarkersCytokinesLipopolysaccharides

Identifiers

PMID18357567
PMCPMC10031642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.