Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18357429›Full record

ReviewDer Orthopade2008

[Treatment options for problematic thoracic and lumbar osteoporotic fractures].

C E Heyde, Z Fekete, Y Robinson, S K Tschöke, R Kayser

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Orthopade, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

C E HeydeKlinik für Unfall-, Orthopädische- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Charité - Campus Benjamin Franklin , Hindenburgdamm 30, 12200 Berlin, Deutschland. christoph.heyde@charite.de
Z Fekete
Y Robinson
S K Tschöke
R Kayser

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most osteoporotic sintering fractures are treated conservatively. However, persistent pain and consecutive spinal deformity may require certain cement-augmenting interventions. These procedures have proven their intermediate-term efficacy in pain reduction, prevention of progressive sintering and improvement of the overall quality of life in the majority of patients. In fractures with relevant spinal stenosis, persisting instability, gross deformity and trauma-associated osteoporotic fractures with or without neurological deficits, the therapeutic options may call for more extensive surgical procedures. In this regard, poor bone quality, age and respective comorbidities of the individual patient must be considered during preoperative planning and management. This article provides an overview of the diverse problem-solving strategies discussed in today's literature. It is generally acknowledged that any decision to perform surgery on an osteoporotic fracture is strongly case-dependent. Treating physicians must therefore master the complete therapeutic spectrum in order to meet this complex orthopedic challenge appropriately.

Indexed as

Back PainFractures, SpontaneousHumansLumbar VertebraeOsteoporosisSpinal FracturesSpinal StenosisThoracic Vertebrae

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.