Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18356816›Full record

ReviewGene therapy2008

Potential of tumour cells for delivering oncolytic viruses.

Z Raykov, J Rommelaere

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Gene therapy, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. A rationally designed A34R mutant oncolytic poxvirus: improved efficacy in peritoneal carcinomatosis.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2013
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Using living cells to transport therapeutic genes for cancer treatment.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2011
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Z RaykovInfection and Cancer Program, Abt. F010 and INSERM U701, German Cancer Research Centre, Heidelberg, Germany. z.raykov@dkfz.de
J Rommelaere

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autologous or allogenic tumour cells have long been used in the fight against cancer as vaccines to awaken the patient's immune system. On the other hand, oncolytic viruses have emerged in recent years as powerful therapeutic tools for selectively killing tumour cells. Yet despite recent improvements in virus production, administration and targeting, the latter strategy remains limited by poor access of oncolytic viruses to primary and metastatic tumour cells. The present review focuses on how to overcome these limitations on oncolytic virus delivery, at least in part, through the use of tumour-derived or in vitro transformed carrier cells. On the basis of existing evidence, novel strategies are proposed for using such cell vehicles, alone or in combination, both as virus factories and as anticancer vaccines.

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesCell Line, TransformedGenetic TherapyHumansNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasmsOncolytic VirotherapyOncolytic VirusesCancer Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID18356816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.