Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18356472›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2008

Diffusion-weighted MR imaging: diagnosing atypical or malignant meningiomas and detecting tumor dedifferentiation.

V A Nagar, J R Ye, W H Ng, Y H Chan, F Hui, C K Lee, C C T Lim

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 223 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Malignant Meningiomas: From Diagnostics to Treatment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. MerlinNature communications · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Meningioma and Other Meningeal Tumors.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Myriad Presentations of Intracranial Meningiomas: Pictoral Essay.Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology · 2022
    Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

V A NagarDepartment of Neuroradiology, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore.
J R Ye
W H Ng
Y H Chan
F Hui
C K Lee
C C T Lim
National Neuroscience Institute · SGNational University of Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeAtypical and malignant meningiomas are uncommon tumors with aggressive behavior and higher mortality, morbidity, and recurrence compared with benign tumors. We investigated the utility of diffusion-weighted (DW) MR imaging to differentiate atypical/malignant from benign meningiomas and to detect histologic dedifferentiation to higher tumor grade. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively compared conventional and DW MR images (b-value 1000 s/mm(2)) acquired on a 1.5T clinical scanner between 25 atypical/malignant and 23 benign meningiomas. The optimal cutoff for the absolute apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and normalized ADC (NADC) ratio to differentiate between the groups was determined by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

resultsIrregular tumor margins, peritumoral edema, and adjacent bone destruction occurred significantly more often in atypical/malignant than in benign meningiomas. The mean ADC of atypical/malignant meningiomas (0.66 +/- 0.13 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) was significantly lower compared with benign meningiomas (0.88 +/- 0.08 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s; P < .0001). Mean NADC ratio in the atypical/malignant group (0.91 +/- 0.18) was also significantly lower than the benign group (1.28 +/- 0.11; P < .0001), without overlap between groups. ROC analysis showed that ADC and NADC thresholds of 0.80 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s and 0.99, respectively, had the best accuracy: at the NADC threshold of 0.99, the sensitivity and specificity were 96% and 100%, respectively. Two patients had isointense benign tumors on initial DW MR imaging, and these became hyperintense with the decrease in ADC and NADC below these thresholds when they progressed to atypical and malignant meningiomas on recurrence.

conclusionsADC and NADC ratios in atypical/malignant meningiomas are significantly lower than in benign tumors. Decrease in ADC and NADC on follow-up imaging may suggest dedifferentiation to higher tumor grade.

Indexed as

AdultCell DedifferentiationDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID18356472
PMCPMC8118818
OpenAlexW2088739245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.