Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18353931›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2008

Automated and manual methods of DNA extraction for Aspergillus fumigatus and Rhizopus oryzae analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR.

Andrea Francesconi, Miki Kasai, Susan M Harrington, Mara G Beveridge, Ruta Petraitiene, Vidmantas Petraitis, Robert L Schaufele, Thomas J Walsh

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Optimization of Toxoplasma gondii DNA extraction from amniotic fluid using NucliSENS easyMAG and comparison with QIAamp DNA minikit.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2012
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Recent advances in the treatment of mucormycosis.Current infectious disease reports · 2010
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Recent advances in the management of mucormycosis: from bench to bedside.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2009
    Review
  20. Diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis using bronchoalveolar lavage in haematology patients: influence of bronchoalveolar lavage human DNA content on real-time PCR performance.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrea FrancesconiNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Miki Kasai
Susan M Harrington
Mara G Beveridge
Ruta Petraitiene
Vidmantas Petraitis
Robert L Schaufele
Thomas J Walsh

Funding

Treatment of Infections in Immunocompromised Children with Cancer, HematopoieticZ01SC006830 · SC · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI WALSH, THOMAS J. · 1996 to 2008
$5.8M
Treatment of Infections in Immunocompromised ChildrenZIASC006830 · NCI · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI WALSH, THOMAS J. · 2009 to 2009
$2.4M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) may improve the detection of fungal pathogens. Extraction of DNA from fungal pathogens is fundamental to optimization of qPCR; however, the loss of fungal DNA during the extraction process is a major limitation to molecular diagnostic tools for pathogenic fungi. We therefore studied representative automated and manual extraction methods for Aspergillus fumigatus and Rhizopus oryzae. Both were analyzed by qPCR for their ability to extract DNA from propagules and germinated hyphal elements (GHE). The limit of detection of A. fumigatus and R. oryzae GHE in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid with either extraction method was 1 GHE/ml. Both methods efficiently extracted DNA from A. fumigatus, with a limit of detection of 1 x 10(2) conidia. Extraction of R. oryzae by the manual method resulted in a limit of detection of 1 x 10(3) sporangiospores. However, extraction with the automated method resulted in a limit of detection of 1 x 10(1) sporangiospores. The amount of time to process 24 samples by the automated method was 2.5 h prior to transferring for automation, 1.3 h of automation, and 10 min postautomation, resulting in a total time of 4 h. The total time required for the manual method was 5.25 h. The automated and manual methods were similar in sensitivity for DNA extraction from A. fumigatus conidia and GHE. For R. oryzae, the automated method was more sensitive for DNA extraction of sporangiospores, while the manual method was more sensitive for GHE in BAL fluid.

Indexed as

AnimalsAspergillosisAspergillus fumigatusAutomationBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidDNA, FungalHumansHyphaePolymerase Chain ReactionRabbitsRhizopusSpores, FungalDNA, Fungal

Identifiers

PMID18353931
PMCPMC2446852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.