ReviewEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2008
Pentavalent human-bovine (WC3) reassortant rotavirus vaccine in special populations: a review of data from the Rotavirus Efficacy and Safety Trial.
Review in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Established and new rotavirus vaccines: a comprehensive review for healthcare professionals.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2022Review
- Vaccination in preterm and low birth weight infants in India.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2022Review
- The performance of licensed rotavirus vaccines and the development of a new generation of rotavirus vaccines: a review.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021Review
- Impact of rotavirus vaccine on premature infants.Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI · 2014Article
- Targeted rotavirus vaccination of high-risk infants; a low cost and highly cost-effective alternative to universal vaccination.BMC medicine · 2013Article
- Changes in childhood diarrhea incidence in nicaragua following 3 years of universal infant rotavirus immunization.The Pediatric infectious disease journal · 2011Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rotavirus gastroenteritis is a disease that causes significant morbidity and mortality worldwide in infants and children. The recent availability of efficacious rotavirus vaccines with favorable safety profiles has prompted medical agencies around the world to register the vaccines and countries and regions to recommend universal vaccination of healthy infants to prevent the serious health and economic consequences of rotavirus illness in children. Premature infants can be especially vulnerable to severe rotavirus infections, which may lead to serious outcomes. The clinical efficacy and safety of the pentavalent human-bovine rotavirus vaccine (PRV, RotaTeq, Merck, Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA) in healthy infants has been evaluated in the large phase III Rotavirus Efficacy and Safety Trial (REST). Preterm (N = 2,070) and exclusively breastfed infants (N = 1,566) were included in this study. The efficacy and safety of PRV in premature infants and in breastfed infants from the REST database are reviewed along with guidelines from national medical organizations for the use of PRV in these populations. Based on these data from the REST study, premature infants receive the same protection from PRV compared with nonpremature infants, without additional safety risk. Similarly, breastfed and nonbreastfed infants are equally protected from severe consequences of rotavirus gastroenteritis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.