Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18350360›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2008

Cognitive and social cognitive functioning in spinocerebellar ataxia : a preliminary characterization.

P Garrard, N H Martin, P Giunti, L Cipolotti

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

P GarrardInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3AR, UK.
N H Martin
P Giunti
L Cipolotti
University College London · GBNational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBUniversity of Palermo · IT

Funding

Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs), are rare neurodegenerative disorders caused by distinct genetic mutations. Clinically, the SCAs are characterised by progressive ataxia and a variety of other features, including cognitive dysfunction. The latter is consistent with a growing body of evidence supporting a cognitive as well as motor role for the cerebellum. Recent suggestions of cerebellar involvement in social cognition have not been extensively explored in these conditions. The availability of definitive molecular diagnosis allows genetically defined subgroups of SCA patients, with distinct patterns of cerebellar and extracerebellar involvement, to be tested comparatively using a common battery of tests of general, social and emotional cognition.

methods: Nine patients with SCA6, and 6 with SCA3 were assessed using a comprehensive battery of neuropsychological instruments, encompassing domains of memory, language, visuo-spatial skills, calculation, attention and executive function, emotional processing and theory of mind (ToM).

resultsThere were no deficits in visuo-spatial processing or calculation in either group, while individuals with naming and attentional difficulties were seen in both. Deficits in memory and executive function were present in both conditions, albeit more pronounced in SCA3. By contrast, both groups demonstrated consistently poor performance on ToM tests, and normal attribution of social and emotional responses.

conclusionThe data support the hypothesis that the cerebellum is important for cognitive as well as motor activity. The pattern of overlap of domain impairments provides tentative preliminary evidence that there is a cerebellar contribution to aspects of memory and executive function and ToM, and that other domains depend more on neural system outside the cerebellum. The findings relating to ToM are relevant to the possibility of cerebellar involvement in autism.

Indexed as

Social BehaviorAdultAgedCerebellumCognitionDisability EvaluationEmotionsFemaleHumansIntelligence TestsMachado-Joseph DiseaseMaleMental RecallMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsPsychomotor Performance

Identifiers

PMID18350360
OpenAlexW1976139809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.