ArticleBritish journal of cancer2008
Clinical outcome and prognostic factors for patients treated within the context of a phase I study: the Royal Marsden Hospital experience.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
97 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Outcomes Among Racial and Ethnic Minority Patients With Advanced Cancers in Phase 1 Trials: A Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2024Pooled it
- The role of age on dose-limiting toxicities in phase I dose-escalation trials.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2014Pooled it
- Justification of the starting dose as the main determinant of accrual time in dose-seeking oncology phase 1 trials.Investigational new drugs · 2010Pooled it
- Safety and efficacy of intratumourally administered INT230-6 in adult patients with advanced solid tumours: results from an open-label phase 1/2 dose escalation study.EBioMedicine · 2025Trial
- Treatment with methylnaltrexone is associated with increased survival in patients with advanced cancer.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2016Trial
- Phase I and pharmacodynamic study of high-dose NGR-hTNF in patients with refractory solid tumours.British journal of cancer · 2013Trial
- SHIVA02 Trial: Using Patients as Their Own Controls to Assess Efficacy of Therapies Based on Molecular Profiling in Patients with Refractory Cancer.Cancer research communications · 2026Article
- Assessment of Multiple Prognostic Scores in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Receiving First-Line, Immune-Based Combinations.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Association of the Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score with Overall Survival in Immunotherapy-Treated Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Single-Center Cohort Study.Urologia internationalis · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of existing scoring systems for early mortality in phase I immunotherapy trials: a head-to-head real-world cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of six clinical prognostic scores in NSCLC patients undergoing first line chemoimmunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Observational
- Inclusion of Older Adults in Early-Phase Cancer Clinical Trials: Safety, Efficacy and a Way Forward.Drugs & aging · 2025Review
- A Real-World Evaluation of Clinical Prognostic Scores in Advanced Melanoma Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- A retrospective study of the impact of comorbidity, polypharmacy and demographic factors on patient inclusion and healthcare delivery in phase I oncology trials.BJC reports · 2025Article
- Circulating Tumor DNA as a Prognostic Biomarker for Selecting Participants to Early Phase Clinical Trials.Journal of immunotherapy and precision oncology · 2025Article
- Biomarkers and ImmuneScores in lung cancer: predictive insights for immunotherapy and combination treatment strategies.Biological procedures online · 2025Review
- Prognostic value of IMDC score in non-small cell lung cancer receiving immunotherapy: old dog, new tricks? : IMDC in lung cancer immunotherapy.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Article
- A single centre experience of patients with rare cancers referred for early phase clinical trials.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Blood-based prognostic scores and early dynamics under immunotherapy to select patients with metastatic solid tumors for continuing immune check-point inhibition: a prospective longitudinal study.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2025Article
37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The main aim of phase I trials is to evaluate the tolerability and pharmacology of a new compound. However, investigating the potential for clinical benefit is also a key objective. Our phase I trial portfolio incorporates a range of new drugs, including molecular targeted agents, sometimes given together with cytotoxic agents. We performed this analysis of response rate, progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) to assess the extent of clinical benefit rate (CBR: partial response (PR)+stable disease (SD)) derived from current trials. We analysed 212 consecutive patients who were treated in 29 phase I studies, from January 2005 to June 2006. All patients had progression of disease prior to study entry. The median age was 58 years (range: 18-86) with a male/female ratio of 2 : 1. A total of 148 patients (70%) were treated in 'first in human trials' involving biological agents (132 patients) or new cytotoxic compounds (16 patients) alone, and 64 patients (30%) received chemotherapy-based regimens with or without biological agents. After a median follow-up time of 34 weeks, the median PFS and OS were 11 and 43 weeks, respectively. The CBR was 53% (9% PR and 44% SD) after the first tumour evaluation after two cycles (between weeks 6 and 8) and has been maintained at 36 and 26% at 3 and 6 months, respectively. Treatment related deaths occurred in 0.47% of our patients and treatment had to be withdrawn in 11.8% of patients due to toxicity. A multivariate analysis (MVA) of 13 factors indicated that low albumin (<35 g l(-1)), lactate dehydrogenase>upper normal limit and >2 sites of metastasis were independent negative prognostic factors for OS. A risk score based on the MVA revealed that patients with a score of 2-3 had a significantly shorter OS compared to patients with a score of 0-1 (24.9 weeks, 95% CI 19.5-30.2 vs 74.1 weeks, 95% CI 53.2-96.2). This analysis shows that a significant number of patients who develop disease progression while receiving standard therapy derived benefit from participation in phase I trials. Risk scoring based on objective clinical parameters indicated that patients with a high score had a significantly shorter OS, and this may help in the process of patient selection for phase I trial entry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.