Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18349316›Full record

Trial reportRadiology2008

Self-expandable esophageal stent loaded with 125I seeds: initial experience in patients with advanced esophageal cancer.

Jin-He Guo, Gao-Jun Teng, Guang-Yu Zhu, Shi-Cheng He, Wen Fang, Gang Deng, Guo-Zhao Li

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Radiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00826813 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2009, after this paper: background citation

Phase IV Study of Self-Expandable Esophageal Stent Loaded With 125I Seeds: a Randomized Controlled Multiple Center Trial in Patients With Advanced Esophageal Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorSoutheast University, ChinaRan2009 to 2011Enrolled250ConditionsEsophageal CancerArmsEsophageal stent placement
NCT01054274 phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2009, after this paper: background citation

Self-Expandable Esophageal Radiation Stent:a Multicentric Randomized Controlled Trial in Patients With Advanced Esophageal Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorSoutheast University, ChinaRan2009Enrolled180ConditionsEsophageal CancerArmsnovel stent, conventional covered stent
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Interventions for dysphagia in oesophageal cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. [Percutaneous biliary stent combined with brachytherapy for malignant obstructive jaundice: a multicenter retrospective controlled study].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jin-He GuoDepartment of Radiology, Zhong-Da Hospital, Southeast University, 87 Dingjiaqiao Road, Nanjing 210009, China.
Gao-Jun Teng
Guang-Yu Zhu
Shi-Cheng He
Wen Fang
Gang Deng
Guo-Zhao Li
Southeast University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo prospectively compare the response to treatment with a self-expandable esophageal stent loaded with iodine 125 ((125)I) seeds for intraluminal brachytherapy versus the response to treatment with a conventional self-expandable covered stent in patients with advanced esophageal cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study protocol was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and informed consent was obtained from each patient. Patients from one institution who had dysphagia caused by inoperable esophageal cancer were randomly assigned to receive treatment with a stent loaded with (125)I seeds (irradiation stent group) or a conventional covered stent (control group). After stent implantation, the outcomes were measured in terms of relief of dysphagia, survival time, and complications related to the procedure. Dysphagia was assigned a grade. A P value of less than .05 was considered to indicate a significant difference.

resultsThe stent was successfully placed in the diseased esophagus in all 53 patients (27 patients in the irradiation stent group and 26 patients in the control group). The dysphagia grades significantly improved in both groups within the 1st month after stent placement but were better in the irradiation stent group than in the control group after 2 months (P < .05). The median and mean survival times were better in the irradiation stent group than in the control group, and the differences were significant (P < .001). Hemorrhage occurred in 16 (30%) patients in both groups combined during follow-up.

conclusionIn patients with advanced esophageal cancer, treatment with an esophageal stent loaded with (125)I seeds, compared with that with a conventional covered stent, has potential benefit in that it allows a slightly longer relief of dysphagia and extended survival.

Indexed as

StentsAgedAged, 80 and overBrachytherapyContrast MediaDeglutition DisordersEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleFluoroscopyHumansIodine RadioisotopesIohexolMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignContrast MediaIodine RadioisotopesIohexol

Identifiers

PMID18349316
OpenAlexW2135667552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.