Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18348980›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2008

Effector proteins exert an important influence on the signaling-active state of the small GTPase Cdc42.

Matthew J Phillips, Guillermo Calero, Britton Chan, Sekar Ramachandran, Richard A Cerione

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Structural Dynamics of Rho GTPases.Journal of molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Molecular subversion of Cdc42 signalling in cancer.Biochemical Society transactions · 2021
    Review
  9. Structure of an inactive conformation of GTP-bound RhoA GTPase.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Endothelial cell-cell adhesion and signaling.Experimental cell research · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. High pressureJournal of biomolecular NMR · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew J PhillipsDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Baker Laboratory, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.
Guillermo Calero
Britton Chan
Sekar Ramachandran
Richard A Cerione
Baker College · USCornell University · USStanford University · US

Funding

Roles of Cdc42 and its signaling partners in cell growth and differentiationR01GM047458 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI CERIONE, RICHARD A. · 1992 to 2016
$5.6M
RECONSTITUTION OF GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR/TYROSINE KINASER01GM040654 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI CERIONE, RICHARD A. · 1988 to 2016
$5.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM40654NIGMS NIH HHS GM47458NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM047458
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

GTP-binding (G) proteins regulate the flow of information in cellular signaling pathways by alternating between a GTP-bound "active" state and a GDP-bound "inactive" state. Cdc42, a member of the Rho family of Ras-related small G-proteins, plays key roles in the regulation of cell shape, motility, and growth. Here we describe the high resolution x-ray crystal structure for Cdc42 bound to the GTP analog guanylyl beta,gamma-methylene-diphosphonate (GMP-PCP) (i.e. the presumed signaling-active state) and show that it is virtually identical to the structures for the signaling-inactive, GDP-bound form of the protein, contrary to what has been reported for Ras and other G-proteins. Especially surprising was that the GMP-PCP- and GDP-bound forms of Cdc42 did not show detectable differences in their Switch I and Switch II loops. Fluorescence studies using a Cdc42 mutant in which a tryptophan residue was introduced at position 32 of Switch I also showed that there was little difference in the Switch I conformation between the GDP- and GMP-PCP-bound states (i.e. <10%), which again differed from Ras where much larger changes in Trp-32 fluorescence were observed when comparing these two nucleotide-bound states (>30%). However, the binding of an effector protein induced significant changes in the Trp-32 emission specifically from GMP-PCP-bound Cdc42, as well as in the phosphate resonances for GTP bound to this G-protein as indicated in NMR studies. An examination of the available structures for Cdc42 complexed to different effector proteins, versus the x-ray crystal structure for GMP-PCP-bound Cdc42, provides a possible explanation for how effectors can distinguish between the GTP- and GDP-bound forms of this G-protein and ensure that the necessary conformational changes for signal propagation occur.

Indexed as

Signal Transductioncdc42 GTP-Binding ProteinCrystallography, X-RayEscherichia coliGuanosine TriphosphateHumansMicroscopy, FluorescenceModels, MolecularMolecular ConformationNucleotidesProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein FoldingSpectrometry, FluorescenceTryptophancdc42 GTP-Binding ProteinGuanosine TriphosphateNucleotidesTryptophan

Identifiers

PMID18348980
PMCPMC2376242
OpenAlexW2149915220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.