Trial reportEuropean journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics
The effect of four different types of diet on the bioavailability of loracarbef.
Trial report in European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This randomized open-label single-dose crossover pharmacokinetic study was carried out to assess the effect of different diets on the bioavailability of loracarbef in 24 healthy male volunteers. A single dose of loracarbef in 200-mg tablet form was administered at 5 different times: after overnight fasting, after two vegetarian (high-fat and low-fat) diets, and following two non-vegetarian (high-fat and low-fat) diets. Serial blood samples were collected up to 10 h post-dose. Serum loracarbef concentrations were determined by a validated high performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method. Area under curve (AUC) values were significantly affected only by non-vegetarian diets; however the time to reach maximum serum concentration (Tmax) was prolonged and the maximum serum concentration (Cmax was decreased by all types of meals. The non-vegetarian diets affected the rate of absorption of loracarbef more than the vegetarian diets. The lowest decrease in Cmax was produced by the high-fat vegetarian diet, while the maximum was produced by the low-fat non-vegetarian diet. The results of this study indicate that while the rate of loracarbef absorption is significantly decreased by all diets, the extent of absorption is only reduced significantly by the non-vegetarian diets. The rate of elimination (k(el)) was not found to be significantly decreased by any of the diets. As compared to the high-fat non-vegetarian diet, the time beyond minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC90) concentration was significantly increased by the high-fat vegetarian diet. The implications of these findings for the large Indian vegetarian population are considerable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18348469What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.