Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18347175›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2008

A gene expression signature that can predict the recurrence of tamoxifen-treated primary breast cancer.

Maïa Chanrion, Vincent Negre, Hélène Fontaine, Nicolas Salvetat, Frédéric Bibeau, Gaëtan Mac Grogan, Louis Mauriac, Dionyssios Katsaros, Franck Molina, Charles Theillet and 1 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. AXL is associated with STAT3 activation in breast cancer.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Maïa ChanrionU868 Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale, Tumoral Identity and Plasticity, Cancer Research Center of Montpellier, Université Montpellier 1, CRLC Val d'Aurelle-Paul Lamarque, France.
Vincent Negre
Hélène Fontaine
Nicolas Salvetat
Frédéric Bibeau
Gaëtan Mac Grogan
Louis Mauriac
Dionyssios Katsaros
Franck Molina
Charles Theillet
Jean-Marie Darbon

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe identification of a molecular signature predicting the relapse of tamoxifen-treated primary breast cancers should help the therapeutic management of estrogen receptor-positive cancers. EXPERIMENTAL

designA series of 132 primary tumors from patients who received adjuvant tamoxifen were analyzed for expression profiles at the whole-genome level by 70-mer oligonucleotide microarrays. A supervised analysis was done to identify an expression signature.

resultsWe defined a 36-gene signature that correctly classified 78% of patients with relapse and 80% of relapse-free patients (79% accuracy). Using 23 independent tumors, we confirmed the accuracy of the signature (78%) whose relevance was further shown by using published microarray data from 60 tamoxifen-treated patients (63% accuracy). Univariate analysis using the validation set of 83 tumors showed that the 36-gene classifier is more efficient in predicting disease-free survival than the traditional histopathologic prognostic factors and is as effective as the Nottingham Prognostic Index or the "Adjuvant!" software. Multivariate analysis showed that the molecular signature is the only independent prognostic factor. A comparison with several already published signatures demonstrated that the 36-gene signature is among the best to classify tumors from both training and validation sets. Kaplan-Meier analyses emphasized its prognostic power both on the whole cohort of patients and on a subgroup with an intermediate risk of recurrence as defined by the St. Gallen criteria.

conclusionThis study identifies a molecular signature specifying a subgroup of patients who do not gain benefits from tamoxifen treatment. These patients may therefore be eligible for alternative endocrine therapies and/or chemotherapy.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsCarcinomaChemotherapy, AdjuvantCluster AnalysisDisease-Free SurvivalDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID18347175
PMCPMC2912334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.