Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18347072›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of cell biology2008

Dynamics of inner kinetochore assembly and maintenance in living cells.

Peter Hemmerich, Stefanie Weidtkamp-Peters, Christian Hoischen, Lars Schmiedeberg, Indri Erliandri, Stephan Diekmann

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of cell biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 112 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed, 186 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Structure and function of the centromere and inner kinetochore.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Oocyte Kinetochores at the Nexus of Meiotic Drive and Segregation Fidelity.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Revisiting the question: When is a centromere not a kinetochore?Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2025
    Review
  6. Preserving centromere identity: right amounts of CENP-A at the right place and time.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A brief historical perspective on cell cycle control of CENP-A assembly and inheritance.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. SUMO control of centromere homeostasis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Mobility of kinetochore proteins measured by FRAP analysis in living cells.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2022
    Article
  19. Kinetochore Architecture Employs Diverse Linker Strategies Across Evolution.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  20. Article

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter HemmerichLeibniz Institute for Age Research, Fritz Lipmann Institute, 07745 Jena, Germany. phemmer@fl i-leibniz.de
Stefanie Weidtkamp-Peters
Christian Hoischen
Lars Schmiedeberg
Indri Erliandri
Stephan Diekmann
Leibniz Institute on Aging - Fritz Lipmann Institute (FLI) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate the dynamics of centromere organization, we have assessed the exchange rates of inner centromere proteins (CENPs) by quantitative microscopy throughout the cell cycle in human cells. CENP-A and CENP-I are stable centromere components that are incorporated into centromeres via a "loading-only" mechanism in G1 and S phase, respectively. A subfraction of CENP-H also stays stably bound to centromeres. In contrast, CENP-B, CENP-C, and some CENP-H and hMis12 exhibit distinct and cell cycle-specific centromere binding stabilities, with residence times ranging from seconds to hours. CENP-C and CENP-H are immobilized at centromeres specifically during replication. In mitosis, all inner CENPs become completely immobilized. CENPs are highly mobile throughout bulk chromatin, which is consistent with a binding-diffusion behavior as the mechanism to scan for vacant high-affinity binding sites at centromeres. Our data reveal a wide range of cell cycle-specific assembly plasticity of the centromere that provides both stability through sustained binding of some components and flexibility through dynamic exchange of other components.

Indexed as

AutoantigensBinding SitesCell CycleCell DivisionCell LineCentromereCentromere Protein ACentromere Protein BChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneChromosome SegregationDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA ReplicationG1 PhaseHumansKinetochoresMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsAutoantigensCENPA protein, humanCENPB protein, humanCenpi protein, ratCentromere Protein ACentromere Protein Bcentromere protein CChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneDNA-Binding ProteinsMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMIS12 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID18347072
PMCPMC2290840
OpenAlexW2125749182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.