Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18343594›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2008

Distribution and phenotypes of unipolar brush cells in relation to the granule cell system of the rat cochlear nucleus.

M R Diño, E Mugnaini

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. A Continuum of Response Properties across the Population of Unipolar Brush Cells in the Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Consensus Paper: Cerebellar Development.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2016
    Review
  10. Article
  11. The Structural Development of the Mouse Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M R DiñoDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Biology, The Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Searle 5-474, 320 East Superior Street, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
E Mugnaini
Northwestern University · US

Funding

ORGANIZATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF NERVOUS TISSUESR01NS009904 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI MARTINA, MARCO · 1985 to 2012
$4.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS009904NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS 09904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In most mammals the cochlear nuclear complex (CN) contains a distributed system of granule cells (GCS), whose parallel fiber axons innervate the dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN). Like their counterpart in cerebellum, CN granules are innervated by mossy fibers of various origins. The GCS is complemented by unipolar brush (UBCs) and Golgi cells, and by stellate and cartwheel cells of the DCN. This cerebellum-like microcircuit modulates the activity of the DCN's main projection neurons, the pyramidal, giant and tuberculoventral neurons, and is thought to improve auditory performance by integrating acoustic and proprioceptive information. In this paper, we focus on the rat UBCs, a chemically heterogeneous neuronal population, using antibodies to calretinin, metabotropic glutamate receptor 1alpha (mGluR1alpha), epidermal growth factor substrate 8 (Eps8) and the transcription factor T-box gene Tbr2 (Tbr2). Eps8 and Tbr2 labeled most of the CN's UBCs, if not the entire population, while calretinin and mGluR1alpha distinguished two largely separate subsets with overlapping distributions. By double labeling with antibodies to Tbr2 and the alpha6 GABA receptor A (GABAA) subunit, we found that UBCs populate all regions of the GCS and occur at remarkably high densities in the DCN and subpeduncular corner, but rarely in the lamina. Although GCS subregions likely share the same microcircuitry, their dissimilar UBC densities suggest they may be functionally distinct. UBCs and granules are also present in regions previously not included in the GCS, namely the rostrodorsal magnocellular portions of ventral cochlear nucleus, vestibular nerve root, trapezoid body, spinal tract and sensory and principal nuclei of the trigeminal nerve, and cerebellar peduncles. The UBC's dendritic brush receives AMPA- and NMDA-mediated input from an individual mossy fiber, favoring singularity of input, and its axon most likely forms several mossy fiber-like endings that target numerous granule cells and other UBCs, as in the cerebellum. The UBCs therefore, may amplify afferent signals temporally and spatially, synchronizing pools of target neurons.

Indexed as

PhenotypeAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAnimalsBrain MappingCalbindin 2Cochlear NucleusNerve FibersNerve NetNeuronsProteinsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptors, GABA-AReceptors, Metabotropic GlutamateS100 Calcium Binding Protein GT-Box Domain ProteinsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingCalb2 protein, ratCalbindin 2Eps8 protein, ratGabra6 protein, ratmetabotropic glutamate receptor type 1ProteinsReceptors, GABA-AReceptors, Metabotropic GlutamateS100 Calcium Binding Protein GT-Box Domain Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18343594
PMCPMC2976595
OpenAlexW1964177363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.