Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18341675›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2008

Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a new approach to oral treatment.

Graeme P Currie, Claire A Butler, Wendy J Anderson, Chris Skinner

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Looking back: editors' pick of 2008.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Graeme P CurrieDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK. graeme.currie@nhs.net
Claire A Butler
Wendy J Anderson
Chris Skinner
Aberdeen Royal Infirmary · GBUniversity of Ulster · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease represents a major global health care burden for both primary and secondary care providers and is the most common respiratory condition necessitating hospital admission. Short-acting bronchodilators play a vital role in immediate relief of symptoms, while inhaled long-acting bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids are advocated for regular use in individuals with persistent symptoms and exacerbations. Theophylline is a nonspecific phosphodiesterase inhibitor and is usually reserved for patients with ongoing symptoms despite optimum inhaled bronchodilator treatment or when difficulty is encountered with inhaler devices. However, it is often not widely used mainly due to frequency of dose-related adverse effects, numerous drug interactions and narrow therapeutic index. This in turn has lead to the development of more selective phosphodiesterase inhibitors in an attempt to create a drug which patients can use with beneficial effects but without the problems associated with theophylline. Current data do indicate that phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors confer some benefits in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease when compared to placebo in terms of lung function, quality of life and exacerbations. They are also generally well tolerated. Further studies are required to determine fully their long-term beneficial and adverse effect profiles and ultimately where they might comfortably sit in management algorithms.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAdministration, OralHumansPhosphodiesterase InhibitorsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTheophyllinePhosphodiesterase InhibitorsTheophylline

Identifiers

PMID18341675
PMCPMC2485219
OpenAlexW2054896413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.